Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


11

NH Gov Wants Tweaks to Gay Marriage Bill

Protection needed for religious opponents before he'll sign

Share

(Newser) – The fate of New Hampshire’s same-sex marriage bill hinges upon giving protection to religious groups opposing the law, the Union Leader reports. Gov. John Lynch says he’ll sign the law if legislators include his suggested changes to clearly state that religious groups can’t be forced to violate their principles and perform the marriages. If that’s not incorporated, Lynch says he will veto the measure.

“At its core, the bill simply changes the term ‘civil union’ to ‘civil marriage,’” the Democrat said in a statement. “I understand the very real feelings of same-sex couples that a separate system is not an equal system. That a civil law that differentiates between their committed relationships and those of heterosexual couples undermines both their dignity and the legitimacy of their families.”

Lynch says he will sign a bill to make his state the sixth to legalize gay marriage, but only if legislators make some changes.
Lynch says he will sign a bill to make his state the sixth to legalize gay marriage, but only if legislators make some changes.   (AP Photo)
New Hampshire legislators discuss the same-sex marriage bill. The governor says he will sign the bill if lawmakers make changes to protect religious groups who oppose gay marriage.
New Hampshire legislators discuss the same-sex marriage bill. The governor says he will sign the bill if lawmakers make changes to protect religious groups who oppose gay marriage.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

New Hampshire's great tradition has always been to come down on the side of individual liberties and protections. That is what I believe we must do today.
- Gov. John Lynch

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
11 comments
VIEWING:
 
TerrifiedCitizen
May 14, 09 4:29 PM CDT
Well, how is it the same? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
lthurman
May 14, 09 4:48 PM CDT
They are married to each other. Duh. I don't think they are trying to force anyone to do anything, in spite of the fears of the fundamentalist twits. I'm secure in my sexuality, (and no, it's none of your business) and don't believe I could be changed. If you want to get upset about something, get upset about the perverts and child molesters who rape and kill children. These others are adults able to make their own choices without your fears and complexes. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
freethemall
May 14, 09 9:12 PM CDT
I don't think they are trying to force anybody to do anything either, but why not humor them (the bigots), and write it into the law?
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Yourself
May 14, 09 6:38 PM CDT
i have no problem if cults, i mean religions, want to disallow gay marriages, but the states need to make sure that if a couple gets married in a court and gets the title of "marriage" then the church can't excommunicate them from the church for having done so. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
kokuaguy
May 14, 09 7:16 PM CDT
Sorry ZERO, you score a goose egg for that answer. The First Amendment was intended to prevent the government from getting involved in that sort of church business. The NH governor is throwing a bone to the conservatives that the legislature should have been smart enough to think of in the first place. Lawsuits by couples trying to force churches to recognize their marriages would be thrown out by the courts, so it makes sense to prevent such complaints from ever being filed. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.