Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


7

SF Smokers May Have to Cough Up for Butt Cleanup

Mayor proposes hefty tax hike to make smokers cover litter removal

Share

(Newser) – San Francisco's mayor believes non-smokers shouldn't have to cover the costs of cleaning up cigarette butts, the New York Times reports. Gavin Newsom has proposed a 33-cent tax on each pack of cigarettes sold, which he says will cover the $10 million a year it costs to pick up after smokers who treat the city like an ashtray—as well as helping persuade more people to kick the habit.

"Fees help reduce the consumption and use of tobacco,” Newsom said. “And we think that will have a very beneficial public health component. It’s not a huge part of the overall budget,” he said of the $11 million he expects the tax to generate. “But it’s enough to keep street sweepers employed.”

Cleaning up cigarette butts from sidewalks, drains, and elsewhere costs San Francisco an estimated $10 million a year.
Cleaning up cigarette butts from sidewalks, drains, and elsewhere costs San Francisco an estimated $10 million a year.   (©waferboard)
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom says cigarette butts and other smoking detritus account for a quarter of the city's litter.
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom says cigarette butts and other smoking detritus account for a quarter of the city's litter.   (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Obviously, we think people should follow the littering laws, in California and elsewhere. But we oppose any additional taxation on smokers to pay for that. - Frank Lester, a spokesman for cigarette manufacturer Reynolds American Inc.

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
7 comments
VIEWING:
 
sailor86
May 19, 09 5:40 AM CDT
It just isn't worth it anymore. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
tameesha_sharpton
May 19, 09 6:54 AM CDT
think how you woud feel if you always used an ashtray and never littered with cigarette butts and now have the privilege of paying an additionl 33 cents per pack. methinks they better hire more street sweepers because EVERY3nei Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
tameesha_sharpton
May 19, 09 6:57 AM CDT
CONTINUED... smoker would use the city as an ashtray, since they are paying to have it cleaned. whay about fast food junkies who litter. why not try to enlighten and ask folk to think twice about littering. ever been to toronto......NO LITTER ANY WHERE !!. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
psycada
May 19, 09 10:26 AM CDT
I wish this guy was in NY politics when the idiots here decided to tax smokers to pay for health insurance for children of non-smokers. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
TerrifiedCitizen
May 19, 09 1:35 PM CDT
Would the total cessation of smoking fix the problem? Would no one taking illicit drugs make that problem go away? Would the banning of all guns mean that no one would ever be murdered? Would capped campaign spending and term limits introduce a better brand of leaders? It's becoming clearer to me that we'll never know. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.