Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Man Tries to Order Priciest Starbucks Drink Ever Total cost: $23.60 »

Usable US Coal Reserves a Fraction of Earlier Estimates

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 8, 2009 10:03 AM CDT

(Newser) – For years the government has estimated that the US has 240 years' worth of coal in the ground, causing officials to dub the US the “Saudi Arabia of Coal.” But that estimate may be grossly exaggerated, the Wall Street Journal reports. While there probably is 240 years' worth of coal in the ground, most of it can’t be profitably extracted.

In Wyoming’s Gillette coal field, the nation’s largest coal bed, less than 6% of the black stuff can be extracted and sold profitably, even if coal prices increase. The US isn’t facing a shortage, but “peak coal” theorists believe current production levels could be unsustainable. “We really can’t say we’re the Saudi Arabia of coal anymore,” said one geologist.

In this April 30, 2007 file photo, a shovel prepares to dump a load of coal into a 320-ton truck at the Black Thunder Mine in Wright, Wyo.
In this April 30, 2007 file photo, a shovel prepares to dump a load of coal into a 320-ton truck at the Black Thunder Mine in Wright, Wyo.   (AP Photo/Matthew Brown, File)
Lignite coal is mined at the Freedom Mine in Beulah, N.D., in this March 28, 2007 file photo.
Lignite coal is mined at the Freedom Mine in Beulah, N.D., in this March 28, 2007 file photo.   (AP Photo/James MacPherson, file)
Unidentified workers reinforce the main shaft as they clear the main passageway of the Crandall Canyon Mine, Aug. 14, 2007.
Unidentified workers reinforce the main shaft as they clear the main passageway of the Crandall Canyon Mine, Aug. 14, 2007.   (AP Photo/Utah America Energy Inc.)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 4 comments
kokuaguy
Jun 8, 2009 9:15 AM CDT
Interesting that the source for this story is the WSJ. If Al Gore were saying such things we know what the reaction of timmie, C_k, infidel, etc. would be.
professortech
Jun 8, 2009 4:14 AM CDT
Why do some people just insist upon going to the "old" solutions. Part ofthe "Green" revolution means using new sources of SOLAR, WIND, Fuel cell technologies, Non-Foodstuff bio fuels not to mention just plain old efficiency and conservation. I don't think that even 100 years of energy (Wildly exaggerated life span of a nuke plant) is worth 100,000 years of ecological due dillegence and potential devastating contatmination by radioactive byproducts - In case you are unfamiliar withthe reality of America's nuclear power program it's inception was born from the idea that we needed a way to legitimize the bomb - see the work of double Noble Prize winner Linus Pauling
Fondue
Jun 8, 2009 3:49 AM CDT
You say that now, and when it's time to dispose of the waste you'll be screaming NIMBY NIMBY NIMBY.

More Newser Stories

Epic Floods Close Australia's Coal Mines

Coal Harms the Planet —and Owns the Senate

Clean Coal Myth Proves Industry Is Declining

Energy Firm to Tell Investors of Risks From Global Warming

Booming India Is Starved for Power


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne