Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


27

Docs' Group Opposes Public Health Insurance

Powerful AMA pushes against Obama, Dem proposals

Share

(Newser) – Just as Republicans and Democrats head for a showdown on health care reform, the American Medical Association is telling Congress that it will oppose a government-sponsored insurance plan—a key, if the most controversial, piece of plans put forward by Dems with support from the White House. The AMA wants health care "provided by private markets, as they are currently." As the New York Times reports, the opposition of the powerful physicians' organization presents reform advocates with a major hurdle.

Obama campaigned on a "public health insurance option" alongside private care, and yesterday Nancy Pelosi reiterated that "a bill will not come out of the House without a public option." But the AMA thinks a public choice will drive private insurers out of the market, leading to an explosion in public costs. The group needs to tread carefully, however; if they push too hard, they might alienate Democrats who are currently supporting their goal of increasing Medicare fees.

Sens. Max Baucus and Charles Grassley talk with reporters after a closed-door committee meeting on an overhaul of the health care system, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 20, 2009.
Sens. Max Baucus and Charles Grassley talk with reporters after a closed-door committee meeting on an overhaul of the health care system, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 20, 2009.   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
The American Medical Association, which counts 250,000 members, will oppose plans for a public insurance option.
The American Medical Association, which counts 250,000 members, will oppose plans for a public insurance option.   (©ernstl)
Barack Obama, accompanied by J. James Rohack of the American Medical Association, speaks about health care reform, Monday, May 11, 2009, in the State Dining Room of the White House.
Barack Obama, accompanied by J. James Rohack of the American Medical Association, speaks about health care reform, Monday, May 11, 2009, in the State Dining Room of the White House.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
Barack Obama speaks about health care reform, Monday, May 11, 2009, in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington.
Barack Obama speaks about health care reform, Monday, May 11, 2009, in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 6, 2009, before a House Ways and Means Committee hearing on health care reform.
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, May 6, 2009, before a House Ways and Means Committee hearing on health care reform.   (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

We will be engaged in discussions in a constructive way. But we absolutely oppose government control of health care decisions or mandatory physician participation in any insurance plan. - Nancy Nielsen, president of the AMA

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
27 comments
VIEWING:
 
Sammy
Jun 11, 09 7:28 AM CDT
My husband is a 61 yr old physician and I have been his office manager for 20 years. The AMA has always opposed govt involvement in health care due to ideological concerns. The private market has failed however. My blood pressure goes up every time I listen to rants about choice, rationing etc. What in the hell do they think we have now? We already have rationing and it is controlled by the greedy private sector. I spend most of my day fighting with the insurance industry over our patients care. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+13
IN RESPONSE:
NewserScooter
Jun 11, 09 8:12 AM CDT
I would rather deal with an ins. co. then the gpvt. who will not fight with you, they will only cut you, laugh while you bleed!
Vote up! Vote down!
-11
IN RESPONSE:
Newser001
Jun 11, 09 10:29 AM CDT
NewserScooter, what if you have nothing, then what...? If you can't afford coverage, then what...? Over 48 million US citizens don't have any coverage. You've got plenty of money, so why care, huh? And doctors have money in f*ck you quantities... So you wonder why they postulate themselves in such a manner? Get real.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
Yourself
Jun 11, 09 5:31 PM CDT
NewserScooter.. i'd hate to be ignorant like you. i really would.... being from Canada and living in the States now, I've come to see first hand how horrible the system is here. Chasing insurance companies, then switching at work our insurance and finding out that i have to change doctor cause our current one isn't covered by the new company, then finding out my wife won't be able to deliver at the hospital of our choice cause that too isn't covered. this system right now SUCKS HARD!!! While living in Canada i never once had to change doctor cause of insurance, i never had to call first to find out what hospital would cover me, i never had to worry about co-pays and ambulance fees, i never had any of those nightmares. I can't wait to get rid of the mess of a system we have now. And i'll be pleased to say i won't be ignorant like NewserScooter when we do!
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
Adapt-Overcome
Jun 15, 09 4:31 PM CDT
Thank you. We had our insurance with Blue Cross-Blue Shield and we had a good policy that covered just about everything (2007) now (2009) they cover squat. We have to spend 5000. out of pocket before they cover anything. They get 8160.00 a year from us, but cover nothing until we spend 5000.00 first. THAT'S NOT THE AMERICAN WAY. That's just plain greed. I'm still fighting coverage on a bill from 2007 because the old policy is fighting the new policy to see who covers it. What a joke. So we pay BCBC to Lobby the cost of treatment and then we get a bill showing how much the insurance company thinks we should pay as appose to what the doctors office is billing. This just forces the doctors and such to over charge so that they can settle for what the insurance companies think they should get, because heaven forbid they actually charge what they should, then the insurance companies would dig into their pockets as well as ours. We need REAL INSURANCE lilke we used to have, not lobbyists. Washington already has plenty of those.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.