Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Mousavi's Iran Might Not Be Much Different

Ex-PM has conservative record; change likely tough under ayatollah

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 17, 2009 9:44 AM CDT

(Newser) – Observers have heralded the candidacy of Mir Hossein Mousavi as a step toward a more moderate Iran—but in fact, Mousavi’s record shows support for some "controversial policies" in Iran, the Wall Street Journal reports. As prime minister in the 1980s, Mousavi was a social conservative, and he backs the ideals of the 1979 Islamic revolution.

“The difference between Ahmadinejad and Mousavi in terms of their actual policies may not be as great as advertised,” President Obama said. Mousavi would likely have a hard time making major changes under Iran’s conservative supreme leader. And if he does gain the presidency, that could make it more difficult for Obama to win international support for stronger sanctions against Iran. That’s “much easier to do if the Iranian president is a Holocaust-denying radical,” said an expert.

Supporters of Iranian opposition leader Mir Hossien Mousavi demonstrate in Tehran, Iran, Tuesday June 16, 2009. Thousands of protesters rallied in Tehran in support of Mousavi.
Supporters of Iranian opposition leader Mir Hossien Mousavi demonstrate in Tehran, Iran, Tuesday June 16, 2009. Thousands of protesters rallied in Tehran in support of Mousavi.   (AP Photo/APTN, Amateur Video)
A woman with a sign showing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that reads He is not my president and one with a poster of Mir Hossein Mousavi, demonstrate near the Iranian embassy in Paris, Tuesday, June 16, 2009.
A woman with a sign showing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that reads "He is not my president" and one with a poster of Mir Hossein Mousavi, demonstrate near the Iranian embassy in Paris, Tuesday, June 16, 2009.   (AP Photo/Laurent Emmanuel)
A supporter of the leading reformist Iranian presidential candidate, Mir Hossein Mousavi.
A supporter of the leading reformist Iranian presidential candidate, Mir Hossein Mousavi.
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 3 comments
kokuaguy
Jun 17, 2009 7:48 AM CDT
Now, have we lost a great member of the community or what? And I guess my threat about the FBI got rid of that racist misogynist troll reader whats-is-nuts from yesterday. Good riddance. And yes, I broke my promise to lay off for 12 hours. Now I'm going. See you tomorrow.
kokuaguy
Jun 17, 2009 7:45 AM CDT
The following are thouhts from a newser member who has sworn off the site (for now) because it can be so addictive, and because if the crazy "rating" policy that allows any troll to come on the site and skew the results without leaving an explanatory comment. Voting thumbs up or down should be limited to those who have left a comment. So, here are some great thoughts from our anonymous member (may she/he find peace and get lots of work done !) Mousavi no different? Course not. Start with Bamford's very concise description of the US backed over through of Mossaedh using religious extremists. Poor pick of a paranoid Shah because of his unfortunate background. Growth of the secret police and their morphing into the Revolutionary Guards. Shah's poor decision to repress fellow Persians instead of whacking the Atollah in Paris. Growth of Communist splinter groups in Tehran because the Soviet's saw an opportunity. Carter's terrible descion to allow Shah into US for hospital treatment resulting in the capture of the American Embassy--it gave Khomeini a reason. Carter trying to negotiate, the horrible failure of Desert one which gave Khomeini even more fuel for the fire. Khomeini killing all the Communists which made US tolerate the revolution without focusing on the bad that religious extremism would produce. Reagan making a deal through Madame Chang to release hostages on Inaugural Day thus owing the favor that produced Iran Contra. Ahmedinejad's selection by the clerics and his constant catering to the poor outside of Tehran. The election not fraud but the carefully-cultivated poor, combined with the secular fear of Mousavi's wife and her makeup. Obama's conciliatory speech which frightens the right wing in Tehran that needs a bad US to control and steal from the poor. The strength of the clerics and Revolutionary guard, which controlling all the oil money, will control Mousavi with an iron hand and combine that with Obama's statement that a fake moderate in Iran actually hurts US interests because a real bogyman is better than a fake. Please ignore misspellings. This is just out of my head and do you want me to find all the links? If you're using it for making a thread and getting ponts than you do the research.
beatmastermcfly
Jun 17, 2009 5:32 AM CDT
"And if he does gain the presidency, that could make it more difficult for Obama to win international support for stronger sanctions against Iran." i thought the point was that we wouldn't need sanctions against Iran if someone less crazy was in charge.

More Newser Stories

Obama's Right: Pragmatism Is Only Way

Clinton: US Is 'Waiting and Watching' on Iran

A Year Later, Iran Tense, Quiet

Iran Seethes Ahead of Revolution Anniversary

Neda's Boyfriend: 'This Movement Will Never Die'


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne