Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


6

Supremes Make Age-Bias Suits Harder to Prove

Ruling puts burden of proof on workers

Share

(Newser) – Workers who sue their employers for age discrimination will find their cases much harder to win under a Supreme Court ruling issued yesterday, the Los Angeles Times reports. The court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled that it is up to employees who believe they were fired or demoted because of their age to prove their age was the deciding factor.

The decision—which applies only to individual workers—reverses a long-standing rule. Previously, the onus was on employers, who had to prove that they had a legitimate reason for the firing apart from age. The AARP, civil rights groups, and the dissenting judges heavily criticized the decision, which comes amid a sharp increase in the number of age bias suits reaching the courts.

Classical music critic Donald Rosenberg of The Plain Dealer stands in front of the paper's downtown offices after filing a lawsuit claiming he was fired due to age discrimination.
Classical music critic Donald Rosenberg of The Plain Dealer stands in front of the paper's downtown offices after filing a lawsuit claiming he was fired due to age discrimination.   (AP Photo/David Richard)
"The burden of persuasion does not shift to the employer, even when a plaintiff has produced some evidence that age was one motivating factor in that decision," Justice Clarence Thomas said.   (AP Photo/Randy Snyder, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

This is a significant and marked change. It imposes a difficult burden on the employee. You are not going to have an employer stand up and announce, 'I'm discriminating against you because of your age.'
- Diana Hoover, a corporate defense lawyer

The burden of persuasion does not shift to the employer, even when a plaintiff has produced some evidence that age was one motivating factor in that decision.
- Justice Clarence Thomas

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
6 comments
VIEWING:
 
Robert_Dada
Jun 19, 09 9:28 AM CDT
Ironic, coming from a group of people who can have their job for life, regardless of their age. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+6
TerrifiedCitizen
Jun 19, 09 9:44 AM CDT
This is a serious violation of implied judicial public trust, and a further erosion of constitutional principles that were designed to protect all citizens from exploitation and oppression. Every justice that voted for this very very transparent political expediency should be ashamed as they have stained the very robes they wear to represent and uphold the rights of the people. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
Mad
Jun 19, 09 10:51 AM CDT
Yeah! What he said!
Vote up! Vote down!
0
SBS
Jun 19, 09 1:40 PM CDT
As long as the court has the makeup it does now businesses will win and the worker will lose. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
freethemall
Jun 19, 09 1:50 PM CDT
The libertarian part of me makes me inclined to think employers should be free to fire anyone they please, for any reason. or no reason. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.