Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Critics Blast Congress for Lack of Staff Diversity

NFL hiring rule may translate to Capitol Hill

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 26, 2009 10:52 AM CDT

(Newser) – Congressional staffs are so overwhelmingly white that Capitol Hill needs its own version of the NFL rule requiring teams hiring a head coach to interview at least one person of color, critics tell the Hill. Frustrated staffers, lobbyists, and aides point out that even though more minorities are being elected, just two Senate chiefs of staff aren’t white. “Given such poor numbers, let’s just acknowledge that there is something broken about this process,” said one lobbyist.

“I don’t think people are out-and-out prejudiced, but there’s a lack of effort,” said Robert Primus, one of only five black House chiefs of staff with white bosses. Something like the Rooney Rule, which forces NFL teams to interview black coaching candidates, might help. Harry Reid has created a diversity officer to help Democratic senators hire minorities, but the House hasn’t followed suit.

A view of the West Front of the Capitol building in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 15, 2009, where President-elect Barack Obama will be sworn-in next Tuesday.
A view of the West Front of the Capitol building in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 15, 2009, where President-elect Barack Obama will be sworn-in next Tuesday.   (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Latino day laborers, urged to show the hands that built America by the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, hold a news conference in front of the Capitol Building in this file photo.
Latino day laborers, urged to show "the hands that built America" by the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, hold a news conference in front of the Capitol Building in this file photo.   (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
A view of the West Front of the Capitol building in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 15, 2009, where President-elect Barack Obama will be sworn-in next Tuesday.
A view of the West Front of the Capitol building in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 15, 2009, where President-elect Barack Obama will be sworn-in next Tuesday.   (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 5 comments
freethemall
Jun 26, 2009 7:57 AM CDT
In response to kokuaguy's response to my post: You're observations on the subject of affirmative action are quite astute. Although I agree with all you say, I would just point out that in the implementation of affirmative action, as justifiable as it most certainly is, there will be instances in which deserving individuals of European or Asiatic descent, will be adversely affected. It is in this sense, that it may be considered a "necessary evil". As for racial profiling, does it make sense to just randomly select individuals. about board an airplane, to be searched, without taking their race into consideration?
kokuaguy
Jun 26, 2009 6:45 AM CDT
I do not see affirmative action to remedy the effects of hundreds of years of slavery and more than a century of Jim Crow as any kind of evil, and as an absolute necessity to achieve a just society. It should be targeted-- most women today, and certainly Barak Obama's or Will Smith's kids, do not need affirmative action to compete successfully, as long as the playing field is level. It is important that the backlash against affirmative action should be offset by programs to benefit poverty stricken populations of all demographics, including pockets of Appalachian poverty that have existed for generations in white communities. "Racial profiling" is not something that I see as having any benefit in the vast majority of situations. The burden of proof should be very heavy on anyone advocating it. Do you have any justifications to offer, free, or any specific examples where you think it has been or could be beneficial?
godawgs
Jun 26, 2009 5:48 AM CDT
The lack of diversity is always talked about, and I can't find a good way to get it explained. If you want to get past looking at a person based on their race then why do we have these mandates? Sports coaching jobs are the worst. Where is the outcry of saying your have draft at least one person of (insert race here) in the top three. Why is it when we talk about diversity that always mean african american? Where is the call for Asian or Hispanic diversity?

More Newser Stories

Lawmakers Shuffled Millions to Relatives' Causes

Lawmakers Use Earmarks to Aid Own Properties

House Votes to Freeze Congress, Federal Pay

Senate Easily Approves Payroll Tax Cut

Looks Like Congress Will Avoid That Shutdown


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne