Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


2

DA's 'Smear' Should Nix Conviction: 'Rockefeller'

Share

(Newser) – Lawyers for Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter—aka Clark Rockefeller—want his conviction overturned because the jury was unfairly prejudiced against their client, the Boston Globe reports. Rockefeller was found guilty of kidnapping his daughter. The lawyers say the prosecution “eviscerated” their insanity defense during closing arguments by calling an unqualified expert witness.

“Don't let this insanity defense be the culminating manipulation in a lifetime of lies,” the lead prosecutor told the jury in closing. In a letter to a state judge, Rockefeller’s lawyers now argue that “the use of the word manipulation suggests that the defendant, his attorneys and, by extension, even his forensic expert witnesses, utilized this defense to con the jury.”

Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter, who calls himself Clark Rockefeller, returns to the courtroom for sentencing after he was found guilty of kidnapping.
Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter, who calls himself Clark Rockefeller, returns to the courtroom for sentencing after he was found guilty of kidnapping.   (AP Photo)
Rockefeller talks to defense attorney Timothy Bradl while the jury deliberates.
Rockefeller talks to defense attorney Timothy Bradl while the jury deliberates.   (AP Photo)
Prosecuting attorney David Deakin, center, talks with defense attorneys Timothy Bradl, left, and Jeffrey Denner, right, at the end of day four of deliberations.
Prosecuting attorney David Deakin, center, talks with defense attorneys Timothy Bradl, left, and Jeffrey Denner, right, at the end of day four of deliberations.   (AP Photo)
Psychiatrist James Chu testifies during the kidnapping trial of Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter.
Psychiatrist James Chu testifies during the kidnapping trial of Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The issues raised in this motion were raised by defense counsel during the trial, and the judge ruled in the commonwealth's favor. - Erika Gully-Santiago, Suffolk County DA spokeswoman

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
2 comments
VIEWING:
 
jwilsonte
Jun 26, 09 5:09 PM CDT
so they did, like all defence attorneys do say anything to get client off .. the guy is crazy but also a conman and does not meet the level of crazy to be excused for his crime !!! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
jwilsonte
Jun 26, 09 5:09 PM CDT
what a loser this guy LOL Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.