Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
15

Climate Bill Doesn't Go Far Enough

Share

(Newser) – The Waxman-Markey climate change bill isn’t as bad for business as its detractors claim, and “that’s the problem,” Bryan Walsh writes in Time. Because of concessions to coal and farm states that depend on the carbon economy, the bill is watered down and seeks to achieve emission reduction through efficiency and offsets. “But carbon offsets are dicey, and may not actually provide the emissions reductions they claim to.”

In fact, some opponents from the environmentalist camp think Waxman-Markey could be worse for the environment than no bill at all. Sure, industry critics “have vastly overstated the likely cost. In fact, they're all but lying.” That’s cold comfort for Walsh, who hopes for more decisive action. “If this is the most that is politically possible in America, we're in trouble, because climate change demands far more.”

GOP representatives wait for the start of a news conference on the Waxman-Markey climate change legislation.
GOP representatives wait for the start of a news conference on the Waxman-Markey climate change legislation.   (AP Photo)
The Conoco Oil Refinery in Rodeo, Calif.
The Conoco Oil Refinery in Rodeo, Calif.   (AP Photo)
A flock of geese flying past a smokestack at the Jeffery Energy Center coal power plant near Emmitt, Kan.
A flock of geese flying past a smokestack at the Jeffery Energy Center coal power plant near Emmitt, Kan.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

This won't get us to where we need to go. It should be a key goal to see renewable energy get picked up under this bill, but it's not happening. That's pretty demoralizing. - Michael Shellenberger, the Breakthrough Institute

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
15 comments
VIEWING:
 
Timinator2K
Jun 27, 09 5:06 PM CDT
Doesn't go far enough??? What? The Stone Age isn't far enough? India and China LAUGH at our pathetically stupid Useful Idiots...all the way to the bank. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Doctor_Zaius
Jun 27, 09 5:10 PM CDT
That's funny, I laugh at you.
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
Clarke
Jun 29, 09 10:08 AM CDT
You must forgive Doctor Zaius....they are not quite as smart on the Planet of the Apes as we are here.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
kokuaguy
Jun 27, 09 6:14 PM CDT
Yes, Doc, one has to laugh at such willful ignorance and obstinacy-- or it could become depressing. http://www.commondreams.org/view/ 2009/06/27-1 Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Deebles
Jun 27, 09 9:22 PM CDT
I made a promise to Clarke that I would not discuss the issue of present day global warming again. But I did not say that I would not discuss the history of it. It's ironic that when oil was first discovered at the turn of the century, it had no use. Churchill, who is dead and doesn't care, chose to convert the British Navy to oil before WW1. Because, of course, they held Iran in their palm and the future BP company could use a boost. And then we had John D.--who can forget the picture of his first well, and then Ford who made it all work. And let's not forget Dwight D. who in his rightly- minded way of ensuring our freedom started the highway system with the idea that every bridge be tall enough to take a tank. That none of these people for saw a problem with the mass burning of fossil fuel says that the problem today is rather a complete surprise. The simple fact that we love both diamonds and cheap electricity says something rather profound about our lack of basic chemistry. Both are enticing and both can be reduced to simple chemistry. As much as a diamond says I love you is as much as cheap carbon based fuel says use me. Intoxicating. Who would fight that? Women who don't want to believe that their bit of carbon diamond which fuels all the violence in South Africa are soulfully intertwined with all the people who look at their electricity and don't want to see that it too comes with a price. If you can ignore the blood on your carbon diamond, I don't think that it is a stretch to ignore that the carbon in the atmosphere can be chemically reduced to whether it came from a fossil fuel or a belching tree. If you prefer to stick your head in the sand--well that just means you're afraid. And that's fine but to mutter to others that their fears are stupid while you are totally unwilling to face them means that you are both hiding from the facts and disavowing them at the same time. And there is a word for that--propaganda. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.