Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


5

Post Not the Only Paper Selling Access

Share

(Newser) – As they wipe the egg off their face, Washington Post executives are probably wondering why they got slammed so badly for selling access to Washington bigwigs and Post reporters at "salons" at the publisher's home. At least two other news organizations—the Wall Street Journal and the Economist—are doing much the same thing, Politico reports.

For a few thousand bucks, the Economist arranges intimate, off-the-record meetings with world leaders. The Journal, meanwhile, is charging $7,500 for a November gathering including the paper’s editors, Tony Blair, Rupert Murdoch, and Arne Duncan. That event is at least on the record, potentially benefiting readers. But in March the Journal arranged an off-record talk by Larry Summers, at the White House, as part of a $5,000-a-head conference.

In this Oct. 31, 2008 file photo, the Washington Post building is seen in Washington.
In this Oct. 31, 2008 file photo, the Washington Post building is seen in Washington.   (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)
The Wall Street Journal allowed Larry Summers to hold a talk off-the-record.
The Wall Street Journal allowed Larry Summers to hold a talk off-the-record.   (AP Photo/ABC News, Lauren Victoria Burke)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

One has to ask, is the amount of money you might generate from this worth damaging that bond with your readers? - Tom Rosenstiel, director of Pew's Project for Excellence in Journalism

The events are off the record because we have found it is the best way for our delegates and host governments to get value from the discussion. It also explicitly means that the event will not be covered by the Economist.
- A spokesman for the Economist

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
5 comments
VIEWING:
 
TerrifiedCitizen
Jul 4, 09 11:28 AM CDT
If all these leaders of industries and nations are so intelligent, why didn't they see the economic disaster coming? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
Sauerkraut
Jul 4, 09 12:26 PM CDT
because they are human?
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
SPH
Jul 4, 09 3:19 PM CDT
Because they profited from it....
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
jwilsonte
Jul 4, 09 6:39 PM CDT
more of the same shame !!! W.H. march sound like obamas change alright Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
anchower
Jul 4, 09 9:56 PM CDT
Less surprising that the Journal and the Economist do it than that the Post does. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.