Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Feds, Swiss Call Timeout in US Tax Evasion Case

By Drew Nelles,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 12, 2009 4:03 PM CDT

(Newser) – Aiming to avoid an ugly international dispute, the US government, Switzerland, and a Swiss bank are seeking to delay a hearing over private bank accounts, the Wall Street Journal reports. The respite would give government officials and UBS until August to strike a deal over data on some 52,000 alleged US tax evaders. The Justice Department and IRS want it; UBS and Switzerland say handing it over would violate Swiss law.

Court filings and a DoJ statement suggest that UBS could accuse some clients of fraud, providing a legal basis for disclosing private information. But the DoJ still wants information on a "significant number of individuals with UBS accounts," the statement says. A federal judge will hear the request for a stay tomorrow.

Mark Branson, chief financial officer for UBS Global Wealth Management, testifies before a Senate subcommittee as it examines how offshore banks maybe helping US clients evade taxes.
Mark Branson, chief financial officer for UBS Global Wealth Management, testifies before a Senate subcommittee as it examines how offshore banks maybe helping US clients evade taxes.   (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
In this Feb. 12, 2009 file photo, the logo of the Swiss bank UBS is shown in Aarau, Switzerland.
In this Feb. 12, 2009 file photo, the logo of the Swiss bank UBS is shown in Aarau, Switzerland.   (AP Photo/Keystone, Alessandro Della Bella, File)
Oswald J. Gruebel, CEO of Swiss Bank UBS, speaks to the shareholders during the general assembly of UBS in Zurich, Switzerland, on Wednesday, April 15, 2009.
Oswald J. Gruebel, CEO of Swiss Bank UBS, speaks to the shareholders during the general assembly of UBS in Zurich, Switzerland, on Wednesday, April 15, 2009.   (AP Photo/Keystone, Patrick B. Kraemer)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 8 comments
kokuaguy
Jul 13, 2009 6:44 AM CDT
I supported him because of his positions on healthcare and the environment. For once I'm afraid I have to agree with Mr. C.
brawne
Jul 13, 2009 2:20 AM CDT
Like your McCain guy could do any better. My guy might be disappointing but he didn't promise his best friend from Annapolis to look after his wife and then steal her and then let her yearn for him while he was a POW and then promptly dump her ass for the chick with the money. Oh and then spend all his time in the Senate making sure that she paid less for her beer products than any other distributer. I think we're both disappointed. The only difference is that my FUCKING ego isn't welded to it.
brawne
Jul 13, 2009 2:11 AM CDT
The biggest problem is that you think I'm a McCain person. To be frustrated with Obama does not make me a McCain guy. Like I would vote for a guy whose biggest claim to fame is surviving five planes that crashed while he was piloting them. My point, I think, was this wouldn't have been an issue if we hadn't elected a guy who said he was going to do something about this. My problem is that like every other candidate he said something he couldn't deliver because me, myself and my meager contributions can't get him re-elected. Disagreeing with the guy you voted for doesn't make you a camp loyalist of the other guy. It makes you an open-minded loyalist to the guy you did follow. You just voted for the guy--you didn't marry him.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne