Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


14

Plan to Crash $100B Space Station Draws Fire

Share

(Newser) – It’s the largest spacecraft mankind has ever built, it’s cost the taxpayers and US allies $100 billion, and in a few years, NASA intends to crash the International Space Station into the Pacific Ocean, letting it burn up in the atmosphere en route. The station is nearly complete, after more than a decade of construction, but there’s no funding for it after 2015, the Washington Post reports.

The "controlled reentry" scheme has sparked debate about whether NASA should go ahead with the plan. “It would be a travesty to de-orbit this thing,” says the space station’s program manager. “We’re going to cede our leadership in human exploration.” But critics say the station serves no purpose save as a shuttle destination. “Give it to China,” says one physicist. “Let them support the damn thing.”

The International Space Station is seen in this photo taken from the space shuttle Discovery.
The International Space Station is seen in this photo taken from the space shuttle Discovery.   (AP Photo/NASA)
This image provided by NASA shows a portion of the International Space Station photographed earlier this month by an Expedition 19 crew member aboard the station as the sun reflects off a solar panel.
This image provided by NASA shows a portion of the International Space Station photographed earlier this month by an Expedition 19 crew member aboard the station as the sun reflects off a solar panel.   (AP Photo/NASA)
The thin line of Earth's atmosphere is seen behind the International Space Station, in this picture taken from Space Shuttle Discovery shortly after leaving the station, March 25, 2009.
The thin line of Earth's atmosphere is seen behind the International Space Station, in this picture taken from Space Shuttle Discovery shortly after leaving the station, March 25, 2009.   (AP Photo/NASA)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Whether it was a great investment or not to begin with, it's imperative for the United States to extract value — real, honest-to-God scientific value — out of that investment. - David Leckrone, senior project scientist for the Hubble Space Telescope

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
14 comments
VIEWING:
 
DavoMax
Jul 13, 09 12:20 PM CDT
Well what the HELL did we build it for in the first place?!?! What a waste of time, engineering and resources. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
Mr.C
Jul 14, 09 1:14 AM CDT
can we part it out on craigslist?
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Cegorach
Jul 17, 09 9:21 PM CDT
This sounds like something a kid would do. "Yay, I completed it.... I'm bored. I wonder what it looks like on fire...?"
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Snarfeh
Jul 13, 09 12:21 PM CDT
Sad. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Mr.C
Jul 14, 09 1:17 AM CDT
I'm afraid the LTHC may be an even bigger waste. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.