Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Plan to Crash $100B Space Station Draws Fire

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 13, 2009 11:05 AM CDT

(Newser) – It’s the largest spacecraft mankind has ever built, it’s cost the taxpayers and US allies $100 billion, and in a few years, NASA intends to crash the International Space Station into the Pacific Ocean, letting it burn up in the atmosphere en route. The station is nearly complete, after more than a decade of construction, but there’s no funding for it after 2015, the Washington Post reports.

The "controlled reentry" scheme has sparked debate about whether NASA should go ahead with the plan. “It would be a travesty to de-orbit this thing,” says the space station’s program manager. “We’re going to cede our leadership in human exploration.” But critics say the station serves no purpose save as a shuttle destination. “Give it to China,” says one physicist. “Let them support the damn thing.”

The International Space Station is seen in this photo taken from the space shuttle Discovery.
The International Space Station is seen in this photo taken from the space shuttle Discovery.   (AP Photo/NASA)
This image provided by NASA shows a portion of the International Space Station photographed earlier this month by an Expedition 19 crew member aboard the station as the sun reflects off a solar panel.
This image provided by NASA shows a portion of the International Space Station photographed earlier this month by an Expedition 19 crew member aboard the station as the sun reflects off a solar panel.   (AP Photo/NASA)
The thin line of Earth's atmosphere is seen behind the International Space Station, in this picture taken from Space Shuttle Discovery shortly after leaving the station, March 25, 2009.
The thin line of Earth's atmosphere is seen behind the International Space Station, in this picture taken from Space Shuttle Discovery shortly after leaving the station, March 25, 2009.   (AP Photo/NASA)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Whether it was a great investment or not to begin with, it's imperative for the United States to extract value — real, honest-to-God scientific value — out of that investment. - David Leckrone, senior project scientist for the Hubble Space Telescope

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 10 comments
Mr.C
Jul 14, 2009 6:17 AM CDT
I'm afraid the LTHC may be an even bigger waste. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...
Mr.C
Jul 14, 2009 6:14 AM CDT
can we part it out on craigslist?
ack
Jul 13, 2009 11:28 AM CDT
It was a travesty to build the useless thing in the first place, and we knew that from the beginning. When even the space geeks complain about something like this, you KNOW it's a bad idea. The money should have gone to rebuilding the moon program -- a moon base would be a perfect jumping-off point for further exploration. The ISS was just a... thing. A useless thing.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne