Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 CONFIRMATION HEARINGS 
37

Sotomayor: Roe v. Wade Is 'Settled Law'

Share

(Newser) – Questioning is under way on Day 2 of Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation hearings, and there has already been much talk of New Haven firefighters and wise Latina women. Asked about that infamous quote early on, Sotomayor replied, “I want to state upfront, unequivocally… I do not believe that any racial or ethnic group has an advantage in sound judging.” She also argued that she was just following precedent in Ricci v. Destafano.

Jeff Sessions wasn't buying it, asking if Sotomayor believed in "real law," and bringing up quotes suggesting she believed her past sympathies influenced her rulings. Sotomayor insisted she strove to remain impartial. Asked about abortion, Sotomayor didn't quibble, saying Roe v. Wade was "settled law," as reaffirmed by Planned Parenthood v. Casey. On the Second Amendment, she said her ruling upholding New York's nunchakus control law was a narrow one, applying to the martial arts weapon.

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor prepares to testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 14, 2009,  before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor prepares to testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 14, 2009, before the Senate Judiciary Committee.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 14, 2009, before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 14, 2009, before the Senate Judiciary Committee.   (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 14, 2009, before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 14, 2009, before the Senate Judiciary Committee.   (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
37 comments
VIEWING:
 
IN RESPONSE:
DeniseVB
Jul 14, 09 9:52 AM CDT
Franken said she was the most qualified SCOTUS nominee in 100 years! Heh.
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
Fondue
Jul 14, 09 10:10 AM CDT
You have a better candidate Denise?
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
ClingingToHope
Jul 14, 09 10:24 AM CDT
DeniseVB. And I bet you Stuart Smalley thinks he's the most qualified senator in 100 years!
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
professortech
Jul 14, 09 11:14 AM CDT
next time you choose to state an opinion engage your brain and get some facts. The American Bar Association rates her as very highly qualified. an impartial review of her record and her judicials service shows that she is more widely experienced in all forms of judicial practice than any judge sitting or appointed within the last 40 years. Solomon himself if appointed by a Democratic would no doubt raise conservative jets of vitrol and knee- jerk republican reactionism.
Vote up! Vote down!
+8
IN RESPONSE:
John
Jul 14, 09 11:34 AM CDT
Sessions is the damaged goods, and one dumb SOB on top of it. What a redneck he is!!!
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.