Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


24

Teen Pregnancies, STDs Increase: CDC

Figures raise concerns after positive trends

Share

(Newser) – After declining in 1991-2005, the US teen birth rate climbed in 2006 and 2007, HealthDay News reports. Crunching numbers from 2002-07, the Centers for Disease Control found a number of trends had flatlined or worsened after a period of improvement.

  • 2004 saw 745,000 pregnancies among females under 20, including 16,000 among girls 10 to 14 years old.
  • One-third of adolescents had no birth-control education before age 18.

  • Syphilis cases are up among both males and females aged 15-24. About 1 million people aged 10-24 were diagnosed with chlamydia, gonorrhea, or syphilis in 2006.
  • That year, the majority of new HIV diagnoses were in males and young people ages 20-24.
  • Almost a quarter of females 15-19 and 45% of females 20-24 had HPV in 2003-2004.
  • Some 100,000 females 10-24 years old sought emergency care for nonfatal sexual assaults from 2004-06.

CDC analysis found a rise in teen pregnancies and STDs.
CDC analysis found a rise in teen pregnancies and STDs.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

It is disheartening that after years of improvement with respect to teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, we now see signs that progress is stalling and many of these trends are going in the wrong direction.
- Janet Collins, CDC

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
24 comments
VIEWING:
 
JonmarkP
Jul 20, 09 1:33 PM CDT
By coincidence, these are the same years Bush stripped funding for education and assistance. Could there be a lesson here, possibly? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+14
IN RESPONSE:
ruserious
Jul 20, 09 2:21 PM CDT
At my college (and colleges nationwide) there was greatly reduced birth control, until Bush cut the funding. I spoke to the PA there, and she said many many girls stopped taking it because they couldn't afford it anymore. I'm sure there's no connection whatsoever to the increased pregnancies.
Vote up! Vote down!
+5
IN RESPONSE:
freethemall
Jul 20, 09 2:47 PM CDT
I got your meaning 7, in spite of the typo, Good post!
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Cegorach
Jul 20, 09 1:51 PM CDT
You may be right that funding for "sex ed" increased the last few years, but you conveniently forgot to mention that the funding increase was for abstinence only "sex ed", which has been proven to work. Jonmark was right to an extent that real sex ed programs (you know, the ones that teach those kids how to protect themselves, rather than relying on "just don't do it") lost funding
Vote up! Vote down!
+11
IN RESPONSE:
Cegorach
Jul 20, 09 1:53 PM CDT
damn typos, that should have read "which has been proven *not* to work."
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.