Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
6

After Watchmen, Bring On Next 'Unfilmables'

Share

(Newser) – Alan Moore’s Watchmen was supposed to be unfilmable. But with the director’s cut hitting stores today, that pretty obviously wasn’t the case. Scott Thill lists some supposedly unfilmable geek bibles for Wired:

  • Sandman: “It’s not film-shaped,” says creator Neil Gaiman. “What I got was, ‘Does The Sandman have a clearly defined bad guy?’ I said, ‘No it doesn’t,’ and they said, ‘Thanks for coming!’” OK, but why not, say, an HBO miniseries?

  • The Dark Knight Returns: We’re probably stuck with the young Christian Bale Batman right now, not Frank Miller’s geriatric version. But The Dark Knight proved that America likes its Batman dark, so it’s possible someday.
  • The Invisibles: Grant Morrison’s brain-bending epic stomps merrily through taboos, and its anarchist heroes are a bit like terrorists, so it’s probably not big-screen material. But a TV version’s eminently possible.
  • Gravity’s Rainbow: Actually, never mind. Nobody's tangling with Thomas Pynchon classic.

A page from
A page from "The Invisibles."   (Flickr)
A page from Neil Gaiman's
A page from Neil Gaiman's "Sandman," depicting the faerie Puck of Midsummer Night's Dream fame.   (Flickr)
A few panels from Neil Gaiman's
A few panels from Neil Gaiman's "Sandman."   (Flickr)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
6 comments
VIEWING:
 
Todd_English
Jul 21, 09 4:22 PM CDT
That's what they said about Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas....however the book much better than movie. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
DarkFrancis
Jul 21, 09 4:27 PM CDT
I saw Watchmen for the first time the other night and was not really impressed with it, other than visually. It was two acts of backstory exposition and one act of...well, I dropped off.. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
JimmyChooLove
Jul 21, 09 4:38 PM CDT
Did they see Watchmen? It might have made it on to film, but the whole thing was a stale disappointing affair. Just because an "unfilmable" film gets made, doesn't mean the final produce is any good. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
johntitor
Jul 21, 09 4:49 PM CDT
Thats why it was "unfilmable." Also why Moore wanted nothing to do with it. Also why sandman will NEVER (hopefully) suffer the same. Most books made into movies aren't as good, they lose something. With graphic novels its even worse since the visual element is already there to begin with. Who knows, maybe Hollywood's exploitation of comics for money give us a screen version of Johnny the Homicidal Maniac? That I would go see..... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Todd_English
Jul 21, 09 5:39 PM CDT
One of the only exceptions of the movie better than the book that I can think of is "Jaws".
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.