Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


11

Trustee Sues Ruth Madoff for $44M

Bankruptcy trustee says fraudster's wife received more than she'll admit to

Share

(Newser) – The trustee in the Bernie Madoff case sued the swindler's wife today to demand the return of $44 million to bilked investors, Newsday reports. The complaint doesn't allege criminal activity by Ruth Madoff but says she directly received funds from her husband’s multi-billion-dollar Ponzi scheme. Ruth Madoff gave up all but $2.5 million of her assets in a forfeiture deal last month, but she's not protected from lawsuits.

"We believe the trustee's action is wrong as a matter of law and fairness," said her attorney. "What makes this complaint particularly perplexing and totally unjustified, however, is the fact that Ruth already forfeited to the United States Attorney's Office almost all of the assets named in this complaint—assets that the U.S. Attorney's Office has publicly committed to distributing to the victims."

In this April 6 file photo, Ruth Madoff is escorted by private security as she leaves the Metropolitan Correctional Center after visiting her husband in New York.
In this April 6 file photo, Ruth Madoff is escorted by private security as she leaves the Metropolitan Correctional Center after visiting her husband in New York.   (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer)
In this March 10 file photo, Bernard Madoff exits Manhattan federal court in New York.
In this March 10 file photo, Bernard Madoff exits Manhattan federal court in New York.   (AP Photo/Louis Lanzano, file)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
11 comments
VIEWING:
 
Timinator2K
Jul 29, 09 4:32 PM CDT
This comment has been removed by Newser’s community. You must be logged in to view this comment. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-4
Jayster999
Jul 29, 09 4:36 PM CDT
This comment has been removed by Newser’s community. You must be logged in to view this comment. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-5
IN RESPONSE:
Shannonals
Jul 29, 09 5:04 PM CDT
You actually think she should retain the funds her husbands stole Jayster? Regardless of her saying she had no idea, (which I'm quite sure she did), what her husband was doing, the funds were ill-gotten. Why should she be able to keep the money?
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
Jayster999
Jul 29, 09 5:07 PM CDT
This comment has been removed by Newser’s community. You must be logged in to view this comment.
Vote up! Vote down!
-5
zaphod
Jul 29, 09 4:53 PM CDT
This comment has been removed by Newser’s community. You must be logged in to view this comment. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.