Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
25

Obama's Kitchen Has Too Many Chefs

President's 32 czars an 'end-run' around Congress: Cantor

Share

(Newser) – President Obama has broken his promise to restore the power of Congress “by appointing a virtual army of ‘czars,’” Republican Eric Cantor writes in the Washington Post. The administration now has at least 32 czars—more than Russia ever did—with each spearheading major policy initiatives. That’s an “end-run around the legislative branch of historic proportions,” the House minority whip contends, because the president's czars don’t need to be confirmed.

The constitution requires that all “principal officers” of the executive branch be approved by Congress. Well, the czars seem fairly principal. The recently deposed car czar managed the government auto takeover, and the pay czar controls the compensation at the top TARP recipients. It’s “not that President Obama’s reliance on czars is illegal,” Cantor writes. “It’s that we have no idea what they’re doing.”

In this photo provided by FOX News, Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., appears on
In this photo provided by FOX News, Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., appears on "Fox News Sunday" in Washington, Sunday, July 12, 2009.   (AP Photo/FOX News Sunday, Freddie Lee)
Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., left, looks on as House Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Va. speaks during a news conference on Iran, Friday, June 19, 2009, on Capitol Hill.
Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., left, looks on as House Minority Whip Eric Cantor of Va. speaks during a news conference on Iran, Friday, June 19, 2009, on Capitol Hill.   (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

At last count, there were at least 32 active czars that we knew of, meaning the current administration has more czars than Imperial Russia. - Eric Cantor

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
25 comments
VIEWING:
 
DJM420
Jul 30, 09 11:46 AM CDT
instead of editorializing, why doesnt he chair a committee to review the 'czar appointing' process? oh, yeah, he's just got to throw accusations around and let talk radio run with it...the republican m.o. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-5
IN RESPONSE:
A1A
Jul 30, 09 11:52 AM CDT
como se dice "astroturfer"?
Vote up! Vote down!
-3
IN RESPONSE:
RobN
Jul 30, 09 11:52 AM CDT
As the minority party, he isn't able to chair a committee. The party controlling Congress would have to start the process and they're not likely to. The most he can actually do is draw attention to it and hope the Congress will act on it. Which is what he's done.
Vote up! Vote down!
+9
IN RESPONSE:
DJM420
Jul 30, 09 12:01 PM CDT
good point robn - on the chair anyways! but if he'd work with congress, instead of against it (as is the republican m.o., maybe a committee would/could happen if its an actual concern, he wouldnt have to chair it (since he cant))
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
IN RESPONSE:
godawgs
Jul 30, 09 1:45 PM CDT
@djm420 is there anything you don't blame the republicans for?
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.