Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 ANALYSIS 
10

Health Care Bills Don't Offer Real Choice

Legislation in Congress seem to settle for status quo

Share

(Newser) – Health insurance firms are essentially monopolies because employers, not individuals, choose which plans to offer. This freedom from competitive forces has allowed insurance to become flaky and opaque—and the reform currently being debated in Washington would do little about it, writes David Leonhardt for the New York Times. Even if a public option were to be created, people with employer-based insurance would be ineligible.

Senators Ron Wyden and Robert Bennett proposed a voucher system in 2007 that has come closest to giving people real choice, but it went nowhere. Support for the employer-based system is strong because taxes and wage deductions hide its true costs from employees, while politicians worry about the dangers of giving ordinary folks “too much” choice. But if the insurance companies were doing a good job, employees would probably stick with their existing plan. And if not, they’d deserve their fate.

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is welcomed by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., in his office on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, June 3, 2009.
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor is welcomed by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., in his office on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, June 3, 2009.   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden makes remarks during an interview in Portland, Ore., Monday, Sept. 17, 2007. His health care proposal has gotten little widespread support among senators.
Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden makes remarks during an interview in Portland, Ore., Monday, Sept. 17, 2007. His health care proposal has gotten little widespread support among senators.   (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Real choice is not part of the bills moving through the Democratic-led Congress. - David Leonhardt, New York Times

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
10 comments
VIEWING:
 
Reader3428
Aug 26, 09 1:53 PM CDT
THis statement is false! "Even if a public option were to be created, people with employer-based insurance would be ineligible." Employers if participating would have a 30 day grace period from when the bill is put in place to decide wether or not they choose to keep their existing plan or join the public option, Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-4
IN RESPONSE:
JonmarkP
Aug 26, 09 5:05 PM CDT
Did you mean "employees if participating would have..."? If not, the statement is true-employers still decide which insurance plan the employees will receive, and how much it will cost each employee.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Reader60610265
Aug 26, 09 7:22 PM CDT
Well said JonmarkP
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Reader60610265
Aug 26, 09 7:23 PM CDT
That should have been below thinkers post, sorry.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Thinker
Aug 26, 09 2:23 PM CDT
Dems are worthless. They offer nothing, and probably welcome the Repub problems so they don't have to take the blame for doing nothing. Obama and Rahm are working behind the scenes to make deals and get contributions from Pharma and health care providers (while screwing us) so the contributions don't go to Repubs in the futuer. Don't expect real reform in anything until we get a real liberal in office. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.