Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
6

Modern Novels' Shift: We Can Understand Them

Literary writers are re-embracing idea of a good plot

Share

(Newser) – The 21st-century novel is being reacquainted with an old friend: the plot. Today's best writers are abandoning the notion that literary novels need to be all but impenetrable to readers without advanced degrees, writes Lev Grossman in the Wall Street Journal. "The revolution is under way," he says. "The novel is getting entertaining again."

The "difficult" novel came to prominence with the Modernists of a century ago (think James Joyce), who found themselves in a world radically different from the slow-paced one of their youths. "The novel was a mirror the Modernists needed to break, the better to reflect their broken world. So they did." Out went plots and understandable narratives. But our world is different, too, and "the novel is finally waking up from its 100-year carbonite nap." Today's books "require a different set of tools, and a basic belief that plot and literary intelligence aren't mutually exclusive."  

Literary novels of old can be headache-inducing.
Literary novels of old can be headache-inducing.   (Shutter Stock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

From a hieratic, hermetic art object the novel is blooming into something more casual and open: a literature of pleasure. The critics will have to catch up. - Lev Grossman in the Wall Street Journal

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
6 comments
VIEWING:
 
Collusive
Aug 29, 09 11:46 AM CDT
Also in news: talking robots prove that modern cinema has changed for the best. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
Robert_Dada
Aug 29, 09 1:55 PM CDT
Books that modern Americans can understand: Welcome to the Idiocracy. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
Rob
Aug 30, 09 6:55 PM CDT
Boob
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Bambi
Aug 29, 09 1:59 PM CDT
Well, our world is still quite broken and we do need our art to address that. Entertainment is entertainment, and art is art. . With entertainment, we get, or rather demand to get what we 'expect' and with art, we are open to exploring something we may not understand at first. The obfuscation is not the art, of course, but authentic expression doesn't just ply the same roads already traveled--it eschews providing the obvious because indeed, that is a commercial service, not an act of expression. Thus, 'real art' may land mysteriously at first, but that's only until it's intuitive 'common sense' has seeped into our consciousness. Sounds like this article is applauding that economic forces have caused publishing to bring novels closer to the dumbed down entertainment/distraction service that TV provides. A weird victory for the intellectually compromised. As soon as it's available, they'll be living their lives wearing state-fed virtual reality headgear, anyway, so it doesn't really matter. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Deebles
Aug 29, 09 4:52 PM CDT
Remember The Bear? That just did me in on the knowing shit so you can break the rules. I loved Pynchon's new book because he stopped the bear thing and the V thing. It is possible to be literary and entertaining. Considering Tristram Shandy to now it's not like it is an old thing. Blood Oranges. Try a dissertation on that. Stupid English. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.