Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
17

Dear Diane, Save the News— Nix the Anchor Job

Sawyer shouldn't take post with 'marginal' journalistic worth

Share

(Newser) – Nightly network news is fading into irrelevance—and if Diane Sawyer wants to make a difference in the media, she should turn down Charlie Gibson’s job so ABC can pay for some real reporting, writes Jack Shafer for Slate. The broadcasts have essentially become infotainment, an expert says, “aping the dreadful local news that they once disdained,” writes Shafer.

“The journalistic value of these programs is marginal at this point,” the media professor notes. And it doesn’t much matter who reads the news “as long as that person is properly groomed and doesn’t drool," Shafer opines. “If you really want to make an indelible mark on journalism,” he advises Sawyer, “turn down the job and persuade ABC News to divert the millions it ordinarily pays its anchor and spend it on 50 or 80 additional reporters to break stories.”

In this image released by ABC, ABC News' Charles Gibson and Diane Sawyer are shown at the White House in Washington on June 24, 2009.
In this image released by ABC, ABC News' Charles Gibson and Diane Sawyer are shown at the White House in Washington on June 24, 2009.   (AP Photo/ABC, Ida Mae Astute)
Diane Sawyer, of
Diane Sawyer, of "Good Morning America," leaves the funeral of Walter Cronkite at St. Bartholomew's Church on Park Ave. in New York, Thursday, July 23, 2009.   (AP Photo/Henny Ray Abrams)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

It's up to Sawyer to decide on her legacy: Ending her career as one of the last over-paid network announcers or helping ABC to plot a new news course. - Jack Shafer

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
17 comments
VIEWING:
 
odowd80
Sep 4, 09 2:15 PM CDT
This is damn good advice. They should definitely take this opportunity to try something different. Imagine a half-hour of 100% investigative journalism. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
BlueAyez
Sep 4, 09 2:28 PM CDT
They did. It's called 60 Minutes -- where Diane Sawyer was one of the hard hitting reporters. Don't underestimate her. Or is this about not having a woman in the lead position?
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
Timinator2K
Sep 4, 09 2:57 PM CDT
I agree but, now everyone has to wonder if they actually remember how to do it and not be spinning it one way or the other to please their ownership or, political masters.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
odowd80
Sep 4, 09 6:00 PM CDT
Yeah, but these days it seems that the right yells "SPIN" every time there's ANY story that's critical of the right. I think viewers need to realize that even broadcasters are human and allow for a little bit of wiggle room as long as they are honestly trying to be objective. An objective story about a corrupt Democratic congressman is not biased, its news.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
DontLikeYou
Sep 5, 09 8:56 AM CDT
Diane Sawyer, a woman, in this position is good. Palin, a woman, in the White House will do more for women than 1000 Diane Sawyers.
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.