Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 MUSIC REVIEW 
8

Beatles Remasters Pack a Wallop

CDs showcase Fab Four as they were meant to be heard

Share

(Newser) – The Beatles just got better: every one of their original albums and a batch of collected singles has been remastered, boosting the quality to the level “the Beatles themselves would have heard and intended,” writes Matt Hurwitz in the Washington Post. The stereo CDs remind us that the Beatles were a “rock band”: these recordings pack a punch not heard on the older discs.

“You can now hear John Lennon's raucous vocal in all its powerfully shredded glory on 'Twist and Shout',” writes Hurwitz. In the past, Paul McCartney’s bass was so powerful it had to be toned down in mastering to keep the needle on the record player. Now, we can finally hear its full range. The new recordings remove pops and clicks not made by the Beatles, "but you can still hear (Ringo) Starr's squeaky bass pedal on 1963's 'All I've Got to Do.'" After all, says one engineer, "We weren't trying to change history."

Ringo Starr  and Paul McCartney are seen at the launch of The Beatles Rockband Xbox game in June.
Ringo Starr and Paul McCartney are seen at the launch of The Beatles Rockband Xbox game in June.   (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)
In this Feb. 9, 1964, file photo, Ed Sullivan, center, stands with the Beatles.
In this Feb. 9, 1964, file photo, Ed Sullivan, center, stands with the Beatles.   (AP Photo)
In this Feb. 9, 1964, file photo, the Beatles perform at the
In this Feb. 9, 1964, file photo, the Beatles perform at the "Ed Sullivan Show" in New York.   (AP Photo, file)
This Oct. 26, 1965, file photo shows John Lennon and Paul McCartney as they smile during a ceremony at Buckingham Palace in London.
This Oct. 26, 1965, file photo shows John Lennon and Paul McCartney as they smile during a ceremony at Buckingham Palace in London.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
8 comments
VIEWING:
 
Timinator2K
Sep 8, 09 2:32 PM CDT
Cool! Looking forward to really hearing it all! Average newser reader: The who? No, the Beatles. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
drlarrymitchell
Sep 8, 09 2:54 PM CDT
THE WHO had a higher-quality output for twice as long of a span. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-8
IN RESPONSE:
WharfRat
Sep 8, 09 5:13 PM CDT
The WHO were really good but they wouldn't have existed without the Beatles.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Snarfeh
Sep 8, 09 7:44 PM CDT
The Rolling Stones out-rocked them both....and STILL out-rock them both....
Vote up! Vote down!
-5
IN RESPONSE:
drlarrymitchell
Sep 9, 09 5:22 AM CDT
Wharf- agreed. But the Who was more celestial in their achievements. Snarly- yes, the Stones rock, but they only have two flavors, really- and their output has been crap-filled since the beginning. Granted, each album has a song or two on it that makes it worth owning- even Dirty Work- but rarely more than that. The Beatles weren't very interesting until they got strung-out on LSD...and then they started to lose the plot. In any instance, i should have prefaced my remark (perhaps unnecessarily) by saying that it was only personal opinion- a quantitative assessment of the group mentioned in terms of overall GETS-MY-ROCKS-OFF goodness.
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.