Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

You're 'Me,' Not 'Myself,' and Other Grammar Peeves

Sad kids do not 'literally tear' the heart out of a mall Santa, and other mistakes

By Harry Kimball,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 10, 2009 4:16 PM CDT

(Newser) – Some common grammar mistakes are also inexcusable, Johnny Truant writes for Copyblogger. Too many of the following, and your readers may decide "that you’re actually a chimpanzee—and not one of the smart ones, either."

  • It's "me," not "myself:" People often "think that complicating the language needlessly will make them sound smart." Usually not. "I did the job myself" is correct. "So-and-so and myself..." is heading down a dangerous path.

  • "Subject/predicate disagreement:"  Take "this person didn’t know what they were doing." Substitute "Bob" for "this person"—is he still a "they?" The proper, if clunky, solution is "he or she."
  • "An historic:" Just like "myself." "Ask yourself if you’d say, 'an horse' or 'an house.'" However you try to rationalize it, the "h" in "historic" is not silent.
  • "Was vs. were:" "Everyone makes this mistake," Truant writes, but still. A simple rule for the subjunctive: "If you’ve used 'if,' that’s a pretty good indicator that were is appropriate."
  • Think about what "literally" literally means: Truant collects "'literally' mentions," like a reference to Britney Spears being “literally on a roller coaster to hell.” Now, that may be true, but if it's not, "metaphorically" would be better.

Letters spell No.
Letters spell "No."   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Writing can be really no-win. It’s not fair, but it’s true. If you obsess over every grammatical and structural point, you can come across as stiff. But if you’re lax and make a bunch of simple errors, you’ll come across as stupid. - Johnny Truant

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 27 comments
AClotfelter
Dec 5, 2009 9:37 AM CST
No, "they" refers to multiple people.
AClotfelter
Dec 5, 2009 9:35 AM CST
heh, just noticed a second mistake: "It's better to have loved AND lost THAN never to have loved at all."
AClotfelter
Dec 5, 2009 9:34 AM CST
"It's better to have loved AND lost then never to have loved at all."

More Newser Stories

High School English: A Waste of Time?

Guess the Most Annoying Word. Ever.

10 Phrases That Need to Die

Many English Speakers Don't Understand English

New York Times Banishes the Word 'Tweet'


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne