Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


14

Obama Skirts Accountability With Policy Czars: Hutchison

Rules are being bent to expand executive power, senator writes

Share

(Newser) – The Obama administration is using its many policy “czars” to skirt the accountability and transparency established by the founding fathers, writes Kay Bailey Hutchison in the Washington Post. The administration has an “unprecedented” 32 czar positions, and “unfortunately,” the senator from Texas writes, “virtually no one can say with certainty what these individuals do or what limits are placed on their authority.”

Hutchison notes that as the senior Republican on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, she deals with issues that concern at least 10 of the czars’ policy specializations—but the president submitted only two for consideration before letting them start their ambiguous work. And the committee can’t compel czars to explain what they are doing, even though they are likely working in the same policy areas. Van Jones’ resignation highlighted the fact that some of these czars may hold radical views and would not pass Senate confirmation, she says. Sadly, much is still unknown about those that remain.

SANTA MONICA, CA - JUNE 14:  Eco-activist Van Jones accepts an award at Global Green USA's 12th Annual Green Cross Millennium Awards on June 14, 2008 in Santa Monica, California.
SANTA MONICA, CA - JUNE 14: Eco-activist Van Jones accepts an award at Global Green USA's 12th Annual Green Cross Millennium Awards on June 14, 2008 in Santa Monica, California.   (Getty Images)
U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, R- Texas,  speaks to the San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in San Antonio, Thursday, Aug. 27, 2009.
U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, R- Texas, speaks to the San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce in San Antonio, Thursday, Aug. 27, 2009.   (AP Photo/Eric Gay)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

It is Congress's duty to know who is serving at the highest levels of government, what they are doing, and what qualifications or complications these people bring to the job. - Kay Bailey Hutchison, US Senator-Texas

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
14 comments
VIEWING:
 
dontlikeyou
Sep 13, 09 2:54 PM CDT
Obama runs his administration with less accountability than GW Bush, yet the liberals don't say a thing about it. Silence from the left as Obama steers our country down a fascist highway at break-neck speed. Martin Luther King once said that he doesn't remember the words of his enemies, but rather the silence of his friends. ---- Shame on you liberals! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-3
IN RESPONSE:
Forderon
Sep 13, 09 3:28 PM CDT
Doc, AnnieChrist, somebody please give with this idiot a history lesson. I'm tired of repeating myself.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
UrUndertaker
Sep 13, 09 4:03 PM CDT
When the Republicans hold themselves accountable for the destruction caused the country by their fearless leader, the great GW Bush and his faithless sidekick and shotgun artist Dickhead Cheney then and only then will anyone worry about Accountability in the Obama Administration....Worrying about that does as much good as hoping against hope that you develop a real brain instead of that feces you have stuffed between your ears don'tlike
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
IN RESPONSE:
SilenceDogood
Sep 13, 09 5:33 PM CDT
Obama was elected not because he was Obama, but because represented something that was 180 degrees opposite of GWB, and that’s fine. However we as a nation are just now realizing what we got, and it not what we were sold. Obama’s transparency is a blackout shade; his czar’s are thugs, Chicago style; his projections for economic recovery are pathetic; his misuse of taxpayer money is legendary; he believes he can use a Jedi mind trick on our nation to achieve his goals; his bipartisan approach to governance is a lie; in other words the public is coming to the opinion that he is a charlatan.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
godawgs
Sep 13, 09 5:38 PM CDT
@ford and Undertaker so basically what I gather from your responses is that it's okay for President Obama to do it because Bush did it?
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.