Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


48

Wife-Beating Branded a 'Pre-Existing Condition'

Eight states allow insurance firms to deny coverage to abused spouses

Share

(Newser) – It is legal in eight states and in DC for insurers to reject victims of domestic violence because being beaten up by your spouse qualifies as "a pre-existing health condition" the Huffington Post reports. If you're in a marriage where it's happened once, the logic goes, you're more likely than the average person to get beaten up again. Democrats campaigning for health care reform note that they tried to outlaw the practice three years ago, but were defeated by Republicans on the Senate Health Committee.

Wyoming Sen. Mike Enzi—a member of the "Gang of Six" lawmakers trying to forge a bipartisan health bill—was among those who voted it down, arguing that it could increase the price of insurance. A survey of insurance companies in 1994 found eight of 16 wouldn't insure victims of domestic violence.

A 1994 survey of 16 insurance firms by then-Rep. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) found that eight had denied coverage to victims of domestic violence.
A 1994 survey of 16 insurance firms by then-Rep. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) found that eight had denied coverage to victims of domestic violence.   (Shutter Stock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Senator Murray continues to believe that victims of domestic violence should not be punished for the crimes of their abusers.
- A spokesperson for Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
48 comments
VIEWING:
 
BlahBlahBlah
Sep 15, 09 8:44 AM CDT
These people make me want to puke! Sometimes a little government intervention is just what we need. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+23
IN RESPONSE:
nick
Sep 15, 09 10:28 AM CDT
I hope that you include the Republicans in Congress who approve of such practices by the insurance companies- in the people who make you want to puke.
Vote up! Vote down!
+12
IN RESPONSE:
Snarfeh
Sep 15, 09 12:57 PM CDT
I'll explain the difference between liberals and conservatives since the repugs won't bother checking out the link : liberals don't want their tax dollars being used to kill people, i.e. paying for wars, while conservatives don't want their tax dollars being used to save people. LINK: http://www.globalone.tv/profiles/blogs/liberals-vs-conservatives
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
Snarfeh
Sep 15, 09 12:58 PM CDT
How about that, eh? There are atheists who are better Christians than are conservatives.
Vote up! Vote down!
+9
Unaffiliated
Sep 15, 09 8:45 AM CDT
OK, so it's not illegal to deny coverage in these cases. The next question is, does the practice actually occur? Are the insurance companies really that callous? My suspicion is, yes, it does, and yes, they are. I just don't understand how people can work for health insurance companies in good conscience. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+15
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.