Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


6

Russia Silent on Iran Concessions

Critics charge that Obama may have scrapped missile shield for nothing

Share

(Newser) – While Russia's leaders praised President Obama's decision to drop plans for a missile shield in Eastern Europe yesterday, they were conspicuously silent on whether they would, in return, join the West in pressuring Iran to halt its nuclear program, the New York Times reports. If Russia doesn't start taking a harder line against Iran, Obama will be seen as have caved in to Russian demands while receiving little in return.

The Obama administration, which needs Russian support in the UN to increase sanctions on Iran, insists that the shift in anti-missile strategy was a response to changing Iranian capabilities, not an effort to appease Russia. But the backlash from Congressional hawks was immediate, and the only sign of movement from Russian President Dmitry Medvedev was the comment, "There always is a score in politics. And if our partners hear some of our concerns, we will, of course, be more attentive to theirs.”

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, left, and Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin smile as they attend the annual Victory Day parade at Moscow's Red Square.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, left, and Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin smile as they attend the annual Victory Day parade at Moscow's Red Square.   (AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko)
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev comments on Obama's announcement that a long-planned missile defense shield hated by Russia will be scrapped.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev comments on Obama's announcement that a long-planned missile defense shield hated by Russia will be scrapped.   (AP Photo/RIA-Novosti, Dmitry Astakhov, Presidential Press Service)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

I hope our administration really thought this through and this was not about appeasing Russia, because I don’t think that justifies the decision. - Riki Ellison, chairman of
the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
6 comments
VIEWING:
 
shonangreg
Sep 19, 09 8:04 AM CDT
This was good for America as well -- it had to be from the beginning. The missile shield Bush was intending to deploy was unproven and plagued by deceit in its tests from the very beginning (what do you expect from a "science denier"?). The alternatives based on the AEGIS ships have been working, and they are designed for the kind of short-range missiles Iran actually has. And as to the shield actually being directed at Russia, the best deterrent against Russian missiles remains what it always has been -- Mutually Assured Destruction. Obama has given up nothing. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
Monjubikahn
Oct 30, 09 9:55 PM CDT
Ron Reagan said to deploy Starwars Planetary Defense Shield. For shame For shame. That system would neutralize any launch. The next innovation will be Drone Nukes. just wait and see. Everyone is so used to Drones that they fail to see their potential as a Nuclear Delivery system.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader60610265
Sep 19, 09 8:15 AM CDT
Of course their silent , they got what they wanted .The missile defence shield won't be built. To any of you libs out there if the missile system was so unproven ,WHY was Russia so upset about it's deployment.So Obama gets to waive is little piece of paper an yell (PEACE IN OUR TIME ) LOL. IT didn't work then and it won't work now . Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
shonangreg
Sep 19, 09 9:33 AM CDT
Fair point. If Russia was convinced it was a boondoggle, they'd be happy to see America waste her resources on it. I don't know why they were afraid -- or pretended to be so. Perhaps they didn't want to see America acting even more reckless, pushing our weight around under the false sense of security from an unproven missile shield. Perhaps Russia saw it as a destabilizing factor regardless of its problems. It is a secondary point though. From our side, we know the tests were rigged from the outset, and we know US defense contractors will say anything to make a buck -- and Bush cronies would say anything and fix any tests in order to get a nice retirement job.
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
Snarfeh
Sep 19, 09 9:21 PM CDT
Maybe it was essentially Swaffelen (Swing when you're winning: http://theridiculant.metro.co.uk/2008/12/swing-when-your.html) between Busch and Putin. Both seem to be that type of personality whereas Obama evidently has enough confidence to not even bother playing. Simplistic, I know, but possibly an accurate summation considering the two leaders involved, Busch and Putin.... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.