Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Obama's New Missile Plan Offers Better Defense: Gates

Strategy deploys more missiles 6 years earlier than under Bush plan

By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 20, 2009 11:41 AM CDT

(Newser) – The Obama administration is upgrading missile defense plans in Europe, not abandoning them, writes Robert Gates, the author of the Bush-era plans recently scrapped, in a New York Times op-ed. The previous plan would not have installed the proposed 10 long-range interceptors in Central Europe until at least 2017, while the first phase of the new plan will deploy scores of sea-based short- and mid-range SM-3 missiles as early as 2011—sensible, considering short- and mid-range missiles are what Iran has now.

The second phase, due in 2015, will put long-range defense capabilities in Central Europe, just like the old plan. The new plan implements a proven technology—the SM-3s—instead of one that still needs development. It deploys scores of them, as opposed to just 10, which is suited to Iran’s likely strategy of launching multiple mid-range attacks on NATO allies, at a much earlier date. The bottom line: “We are strengthening—not scrapping—missile defense in Europe,” the defense secretary writes.

A C300 anti-aircraft missile flies over head during an air defense exercise near the Black sea town of Shabla east of the Bulgarian capital Sofia, Friday, Sept. 4, 2009.
A C300 anti-aircraft missile flies over head during an air defense exercise near the Black sea town of Shabla east of the Bulgarian capital Sofia, Friday, Sept. 4, 2009.   (AP Photo/Petar Petrov)
Defense Robert Gates meets with reporters at the Pentagon, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2009.
Defense Robert Gates meets with reporters at the Pentagon, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2009.   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Those who say we are scrapping missile defense in Europe are either misinformed or misrepresenting what we are doing.
- Robert Gates, US Defense Secretary

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 12 comments
freethemall
Sep 22, 2009 7:57 AM CDT
Could be Cap'n. I can think of no other reason they would be upset about the loss of a system of dubious effectuality ostensibly to be deployed for the purpose of defending against a missile attack from Iran. Shouldn't they be worried more about Russia than Iran?
freethemall
Sep 21, 2009 4:07 AM CDT
Somehow the reality of the NATO alliance and all it entails had slipped by mind. The fact that NATO is deemed a necessity, post cold war, is an indication that Russia remains an adversary, even though it no longer forms the bulk of what was once labeled "the evil empire".
freethemall
Sep 21, 2009 3:53 AM CDT
Good question BoZo. At least I thought so; somebody else thumbed you down, but I evened you up.

More Newser Stories

What We've Learned From Robert Gates

Obama Weighs Quicker Afghanistan Pullout

Supreme Court Steps Into Thorny Case on Jerusalem

Court Overturns Stem Cell Ban

GOP to Obama: Step Up Immigration Raids


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne