Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 ANALYSIS 
4

Don't Let the Recession Rule Out Retirement

Save more, use 'catch-up' tax law provisions to turn things around

Share

(Newser) – Retirement savers have been facing grim truths, like the fact that a 50% portfolio loss requires 100% in earnings to recover. But middle-of-the-road investors could recover in as little as 2 years if they make contributions, receive a company match, and see fair long-term portfolio returns, writes Linda Stern in Newsweek. Still, much depends on a person's age and wealth before the recession hit.

Younger investors will fare the best, for they can afford to take bigger risks and take advantage of historically low prices. Meanwhile, older folks—some of whom "may never recover"—should save more and use “catch-up” provisions in tax law to invest more money in their 401(k)s and personal retirement-savings accounts. Above all, experts say, the best advice is to spend less, save and invest more, and hope the math improves.

The average 401(k) account was off about 22 percent from where it stood at the end of 2007.
The average 401(k) account was off about 22 percent from where it stood at the end of 2007.   (Shutter Stock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

What's the best way to rebuild your nest egg? According to most financial advisers, don't lament the tumult of the last year or try too hard to profit from short-term share prices going forward.
- Linda Stern, Newsweek

Instead, clients should simply stick with their plans: save and invest more, spend less, and try not to worry about the ups and downs that will always be a part of the financial markets.
- Linda Stern, Newsweek

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
4 comments
VIEWING:
 
radnip
Sep 20, 09 5:40 PM CDT
How about taking back the money that the exploiters keep for themselves? That would be the billions (trillions) that workers contribute to all those billionaires, centimillionaires, and millionaires, just so the workers can end up with no retirement. Gee, this sounds familiar. Hmm...16th century? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
schmidtkoff
Sep 21, 09 10:27 AM CDT
i vote for a redistribution of wealth. with all of the Billionaires in the conuntry - they could give every adult citizen @10,000. dollars to get out of the proverbial hole they're in. and that's a conservative figure.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
RobN
Sep 20, 09 6:09 PM CDT
All that "expertise" and all they got is save more? Thanks for the help, I certainly wouldn't have thought of that on my own. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
justme
Sep 20, 09 7:41 PM CDT
Actually, I got hurt bad in the market initially but most of it has come back. Unless you need it to survive, why sell on a market downturn? American business is strong enough to come back even if the politicians try to "fix" it. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.