Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 ANALYSIS 
10

Who Leaked to Woodward? Good Luck

McChrystal report could help the Pentagon, or the White House, or...

Share

(Newser) – The question du jour in Washington is who leaked Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s report advocating an increased troop presence in Afghanistan to Bob Woodward, Ben Smith writes on Politico. But the outcome of this tried and true “capital parlor game” is far from certain. Some Beltway insiders think the leak is a coup for the Pentagon, while others believe it can’t but help the White House. And without a clear motive, all bets are off.

While some believe the leak adds urgency to McChyrstal’s push for more boots on the ground, others think the appearance of strong military opinion will actually take some pressure off the president as critical supporters more fully understand his situation. It could be evidence of a deep internal rift at the White House—or just some official looking for a plum spot in Woodward’s next book. The only clear lesson, Smith writes, is that “the celebrated Washington Post reporter has penetrated yet another administration.”

Bob Woodward.
Bob Woodward.   (AP Photo)
Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal.
Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal.   (AP Photo)
President Barack Obama.
President Barack Obama.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Unless the West Wing somehow orchestrated an elaborate head fake— authorizing what looks like an intolerable breach of Obama’s internal deliberations—the Woodward story suggests deeper problems. - Ben Smith

CENTCOMM is the leading suspect. If this were a bag drop, the administration would have made the redactions they later negotiated with the Post - Mike Allen

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
10 comments
VIEWING:
 
timeandagain
Sep 22, 09 12:07 PM CDT
It was probably Sasha or Malia... Aren't they managing our overseas conflicts now? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
IN RESPONSE:
Reader64481089
Sep 22, 09 1:24 PM CDT
I think it was the dog, look at the Bush Beans commercial as that dog used as an example of loyalty. Damn dogs, up for grabs to the highest bidder and this story is about as relevant as Bush Beans or at least the outcome if you eat to many :(
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
tman3220
Sep 22, 09 1:40 PM CDT
Sasha and Malia would do a much better job than their daddy.... I noticed Buh appears to have been purged from this very tolerant online news post.... hmmm..... yall don't like debate???? How very socialist of you.... No wonder you support Obama...... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
RockyPneumonia
Sep 22, 09 3:54 PM CDT
You really consider that the contributions of Buh had anything to do with debate? a discussion is only a"debate" when both arguments are based in fact...and "fact" is not defined as "what right-wingers wish were so".
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
shonangreg
Sep 22, 09 7:33 PM CDT
Cheers, Rocky. And trman, we do like debate. We want some true conservatives who can defend their position here. We have so few of them. Buh and dontlike and rightthing, etc. do not show this ability. You are doing much better. Why would "socialists" not like debate?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.