Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
30

'Fat Tax' Is Really a Poor Tax

Share

(Newser) – With Congress contemplating a trillion dollar health care bill, the idea of the “fat tax” has come back into vogue as a way to slim down Americans. Supporters say junk food is every bit the addictive drug that cigarettes are, designed by food scientists to be “hyperpalatable,” and nigh-irresistible. “It’s hard to draw a line, though, between foods that are drugs and foods that are merely delicious,” writes Daniel Engber of Slate.

Let's face it, many gourmands happily ignore the butter filling the sauces of Michelin’s finest. In other words, “Doughnuts are a drug; brioche is a treat. Some tastes are more equal than others,” Engber writes. A fat tax would discriminate between the delights of the poor and the rich. It might redistribute wealth—it definitely “will redistribute pleasure.”

The rich will not be eating this hyperpalatable lunch anytime soon.
The rich will not be eating this hyperpalatable lunch anytime soon.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Soda is like a designer drug layered with seductive elements—sweetness for a burst of dopamine, bubbles to prick the trigeminal nerve. - Daniel Engber

What about the folks who can't afford a $5 bottle of POM? No big deal, say the academics, they can always drink from a faucet. So much for Let them eat cake.
- Daniel Engber

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
30 comments
VIEWING:
 
Derni
Sep 22, 09 1:20 PM CDT
So we're worried about healtgh care and the Gov't wants to tax soda-fast foods etc. and you all were worried about health care! The Gov't will rule out options by having taxes on certain foods and drinks-they will limit your choices via making some more affordable than others- Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+6
IN RESPONSE:
Reader64481089
Sep 22, 09 1:29 PM CDT
Same old b/s only this time set to affect a ;larger number, it is the so called "Sin Tax" they use on liquor, cigarettes and other such items. Before when using this aproach it only affected a small number of people as a whole but this is set to take a nice bite (no pun intended) out of the general population and there may be enough people adversly effected to actually make it tough for Congress to get away with. They want to pass it off on the poor while still allowing the rich to remain happy with several tax breaks given to them before and which they still enjoy, they may be paying more than 2 years ago but their tax burden still has not risen to what it was even 10 years ago.
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
BlueAyez
Sep 22, 09 2:24 PM CDT
And that's what needs to happen. But I seriously doubt that a nickel tax on fast food is going to make people stop or even curb buying it.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
odowd80
Sep 22, 09 2:47 PM CDT
Why don't we just do what Republicans do and just borrow the money instead of raising taxes?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Unaffiliated
Sep 22, 09 1:23 PM CDT
I'm fully aware of the addictive nature of foods with fat and sugar, but I also fully oppose attempts by the government to regulate what I can and cannot eat. Focus on education as the means to solve the obesity epidemic. Teach the kids of today to exercise more and eat less. This has to come from parents and teachers, not the government. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+8
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.