Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 ANALYSIS 
25

Premiums Likely to Soar Under Obamacare

Share

(Newser) – Current health care legislation would require every American to buy health insurance, but would do little or nothing to control the skyrocketing premiums they’d have to pay, the LA Times reports. Versions of the bill try to address the problem indirectly—with a public option in the House bill and nonprofit co-ops in Baucus’s Senate bill—but no one is proposing the direct premium controls states have on other mandated insurances, like auto insurance.

And while skyrocketing premiums could stir the market, boosting competition and reining in costs, that would be a long road. And beyond premiums, neither bill is poised to regulate what doctors, hospitals, and drugmakers could charge, a measure used to control costs overseas. “You can’t restrain premiums unless you restrain medical costs,” said the head of an insurance lobbying group. “So far, members of Congress have been allergic to that.”

President Barack Obama gestures while delivering remarks during a health care rally, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2009, at the University of Maryland in College Park, Md.
President Barack Obama gestures while delivering remarks during a health care rally, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2009, at the University of Maryland in College Park, Md.   (AP Photo/Rob Carr)
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., listens on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 23, 2009, as the committee continued working on the health care legislation.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., listens on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 23, 2009, as the committee continued working on the health care legislation.   (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. speaks to reporters during a news conference on health care legislation, Wednesday, Sept. 16, 2009, Capitol Hill.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. speaks to reporters during a news conference on health care legislation, Wednesday, Sept. 16, 2009, Capitol Hill.   (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
25 comments
VIEWING:
 
Doctor_Zaius
Sep 24, 09 9:42 AM CDT
That's the purpose of a public option. To compete with the predatory insurance companies. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+7
IN RESPONSE:
psycada
Sep 24, 09 9:43 AM CDT
not necessarily public, but not for profit is the key. Private industry can create a non-for-profit just as easily as the government, prolly easier and more efficient.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
Fondue
Sep 24, 09 9:56 AM CDT
Would a private non-profit have as low an overhead as the government? Medicare is 3%.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
psycada
Sep 24, 09 10:02 AM CDT
@ Fondue - I can not say for sure.I do know as long as their is a non-for-profit option, whether its public or private, insurance companies won't dare raise their rates without substantial increase in coverage over the NFP option.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Doctor_Zaius
Sep 24, 09 10:27 AM CDT
That's 3% while insuring high risk old people.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.