Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


46

Most Hypocritical Book Bannings

Share

(Newser) – Banning a book is a move laden with ironies that can make the banner seem dull-witted in the long run. For National Banned Books Week, 11Points.com lists "the most hypocritical, ignorant, and, based on the content of the books, ironic" bans:

  • Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury: The sci-fi classic is about a future government that bans and burns books. 'Nuff said?

  • The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Mark Twain: The anti-slavery classic is still banned in places for its use of the word "nigger."
  • The Satanic Verses, Salman Rushdie: A book satirizing "narrow-minded" aspects of Islam inspired Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini to put out a hit on the author.
  • Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl: Banned in Alabama for being "a real downer."
  • The Harry Potter series, JK Rowling: Religious watchdog groups outlawed a series that teaches "love, understanding, and tolerance."
For more, click the link below.

Visitors walk past a poster of the latest
Visitors walk past a poster of the latest "Harry Potter" book on the first day of the annual Hong Kong book fair at the Convention Center in Hong Kong, Wednesday, July 18, 2007.   (AP Photo/Vincent Yu)
"The Diary of Anne Frank" was banned in Alabama for being "a real downer."   (Flickr)
A pyromaniac-loving ad for
A pyromaniac-loving ad for "Fahrenheit 451," by Ray Bradbury.   (Flickr)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
46 comments
VIEWING:
 
polstroad
Sep 27, 09 11:42 AM CDT
why not ban the bible? it offers lots of killings, war, adulterous arrangements within marriage? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+26
IN RESPONSE:
Newuser
Sep 27, 09 11:43 AM CDT
If they do, then they have to ban all religious books, out of fairness.
Vote up! Vote down!
+13
IN RESPONSE:
paul123
Sep 27, 09 2:09 PM CDT
true enough polstroad, but these events are presented as a matter of reporting on events, yet not condoning them.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
kyleleitch
Sep 27, 09 2:34 PM CDT
@paul123, I don't think Fahrenheit 451 was condoning book burning....
Vote up! Vote down!
+7
IN RESPONSE:
Reader64481089
Sep 27, 09 4:05 PM CDT
BAN THEM ALL!!! Hell if we continue allowing the population to go unchecked and actually educating themselves they may begin to think and Oh My what a disaster that would be. They might even begin to think independently and what ever would the upper class do then when they had to actually do their own labor and other such things, can you imagine?.....Now with that said anyone who condones any book banning is a fool and an idiot. Many of today's young can't even read a book and I find that totally unacceptable. I along with two colleagues volunteered to teach the young poor in our city, the ages were high school level and a few middle school level as well. 4 out of 17 young people lacked a 3rd gradeers reading skills and 2 others could not read at all. One 10 grader had never once failed in school yet you not recognize his own name when written when we began. After bringing them all to an acceptable reading level then we could move forward teaching them skills on computers to help them get off the street and see a huge world where they could move forward and not rot away in the Ghetto as so many do.
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.