Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

CDC Must Stop Advocating Circumcision

Male procedure just as backward as reviled female version

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 29, 2009 2:54 PM CDT

(Newser) – Virtually everyone in the Western world seems to agree that female circumcision is horrible. It greatly reduces sexual pleasure, violates individual autonomy, and provides no discernible health benefits. Well, all that is true of male circumcision, too, writes Ethan Epstein, yet the CDC is considering a plan to “promote routine circumcision” for infant boys. It’s “as degrading as it is illiberal.”

The push supposedly is intended to help reduce the spread of HIV. But the evidence behind that claim is incredibly dubious, and even if it did help, it “would remain an affront to human dignity,” Epstein writes for Spiked. Men deserve to control their body just as much as women. No one—not their parents, and certainly not the CDC—should involuntarily deny boys a lifetime of sexual pleasure.

Maha Mohammed and her daughter Rehab, left, listen to workers from a local rights group, not pictured, who explain the dangers of female circumcision during a visit to Mohammed's home,  Dec. 5, 2007.
Maha Mohammed and her daughter Rehab, left, listen to workers from a local rights group, not pictured, who explain the dangers of female circumcision during a visit to Mohammed's home, Dec. 5, 2007.   (AP Photo/Anna Johnson)
A boy screams as paramedics and relatives hold him down during a charge-free mass circumcision in Jakarta, Indonesia, Sunday, July 1, 2007.
A boy screams as paramedics and relatives hold him down during a charge-free mass circumcision in Jakarta, Indonesia, Sunday, July 1, 2007.   (AP Photo/Dita Alangkara)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Is there really any ethical difference between circumcising a baby against his will and circumcising an adult against his will? - Ethan Epstein

Despite the claims of medical fearmongers, fewer than 500,000 Americans are living with AIDs in a country of over 300 million people.
To recommend universal circumcision is a wild overreaction. - Ethan Epstein

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 44 comments
kirei_gaisuto
Sep 30, 2009 12:35 PM CDT
Genital mutilation is genital mutilation people. Whether it's a boy or a girl. If a boy grows up and decides he wants the procedure done, then that's his right. Cutting off body parts cause it "looks better" and SLIGHTLY reduces the risk of infection is stupid. I've known plenty of uncircumcised guys and they'll tell you that it's not that big of a deal to clean it. And you know it's not just skin. It has nerve endings and shit. And they don't even numb it or put the baby out. They just cut it off while they're wide awake. So tell me how that's less barbaric than scissoring off a baby girl's clitoris.
Hip
Sep 30, 2009 12:18 PM CDT
Oops...circumcise
Reader65069154
Sep 30, 2009 12:17 PM CDT
@resonator do your homework. If 70% reduction is "slightly" according to your math, then I'll take a slight tax reduction and you can pay in full. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/84.../

More Newser Stories

Report: 1 in 22 Black Americans Will Get HIV

Circumcision Prevents Sex-Related Injuries

Scandinavia Battles Genital Mutilation

Rush to Obama: Hands Off My Private Parts

Teen Pregnancies, STDs Increase: CDC


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne