Photo of Nude Tween Brooke Shields Stokes Controversy
Critic slams display as 'magnet for pedophiles'
By Nick McMaster, Newser Staff
Posted Sep 29, 2009 4:58 PM CDT
Brooke Shields speaks at the memorial service for music legend Michael Jackson, at the Staples Center in Los Angeles, on Tuesday, July 7, 2009.   (AP Photo/Gabriel Bouys, pool)

(Newser) – A nude photo of 10-year-old Brooke Shields set to appear in an exhibition at the Tate Modern is drawing criticism from child-safety advocates. The photo, by Richard Prince, shows a heavily made-up Shields standing in a bathtub looking into the camera. Prince has said the work, Spiritual America, comments on Shields as an “abstract entity.”

She looks like "a body with two different sexes, maybe more, and a head that looks like it's got a different birthday,” Prince said. The social commentary was lost on child advocates, who slammed the photo: “Shields was 10 years old—she could not have given informed consent to it being used. It must be bordering on child pornography. It is certainly not art,” the founder of an advocacy group tells the Telegraph. “Putting the picture in a room with a warning outside really is a magnet for pedophiles."

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Photo of Nude Tween Brooke Shields Stokes Controversy is...
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 41 comments
Aelius
Oct 1, 2009 7:53 AM CDT
Well, I'm always open to changing my mind. It's unfortunate that it's difficult to have an actual debate here on Newser. It mostly comes down to someone calling someone else a bad name a calling it game over. If you actually have a logical argument against anything I'm saying, please, if it's that important to you, explain yourself. I give the utmost respect to everyone as long as they do the same to me. I understand my positions on child pornography and pedophilia may be disturbing to many people, but that's because most people haven't heard arguments such as the ones I am presenting. It goes against their intuition and natural tendency to protect children, but I'm hoping I can get people to think critically about it and not emotionally.
DontLikeYou___
Oct 1, 2009 6:37 AM CDT
@Thinker.... how in the hell did you diverge to that? You are one weird fuck.
DontLikeYou___
Oct 1, 2009 6:35 AM CDT
Only in liberal land.