Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Uproar After NC State Agent 'Fixes' Girl's Lunch Preschooler has to eat chicken nuggets instead of mom's meal »

Don't Apologize, Meg, Voting Is Dumb

Whitman's ballot wouldn't have made a difference anyway

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 30, 2009 10:42 AM CDT

(Newser) – Meg Whitman has taken heat for her, ahem, spotty voting record—the ex-CEO wasn’t even registered to vote until 2002—and, of course, she has apologized. But she shouldn’t have, writes Christopher Beam for Slate. Economists have long argued that, from an individual’s perspective, voting is irrational. The odds that your vote will determine the outcome of an election are, statistically speaking, close to zero; in California "you're more likely to win the Powerball jackpot thousands of times over than to swing the election."

Sure, most Americans bristle at that suggestion, and trot out the “What if everyone thought that way?” rationale. But everyone doesn’t think that way and, if they did, “I would vote,” one economist says. Besides, as a CEO, Whitman could do a lot more to influence American life with an hour at the office than an hour at the polling place. But Beam acknowledges that Whitman coming out "against voting would be like a CEO coming out against bonuses"—it ain't going to happen. 

Former eBay chief executive Meg Whitman speaks at a news conference at the California Republican Convention in Indian Wells, Calif., on Saturday, Sept. 26, 2009.
Former eBay chief executive Meg Whitman speaks at a news conference at the California Republican Convention in Indian Wells, Calif., on Saturday, Sept. 26, 2009.   (AP Photo/Francis Specker)
California Republican Gubernatorial candidate and former eBay CEO Meg Whitman speaks at the Silicon Valley Leadership Forum at Yahoo headquarter in Sunnyvale, Calif., Monday, April 27, 2009.
California Republican Gubernatorial candidate and former eBay CEO Meg Whitman speaks at the Silicon Valley Leadership Forum at Yahoo headquarter in Sunnyvale, Calif., Monday, April 27, 2009.   (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Of course, no politician would ever come out against voting. That would be like a CEO coming out against bonuses. - Christopher Beam

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 10 comments
Robert_Dada
Oct 1, 2009 12:05 PM CDT
Maybe she will become a role model for other registered republicans.
Spudsy
Sep 30, 2009 10:19 AM CDT
Sadly true. But why vote when her lobbyist's money got her company whatever it wanted for the past eight years.
Snarfeh
Sep 30, 2009 10:16 AM CDT
Dwayne Powell of the Raleigh News & Observer did an editorial cartoon many years ago that showed a guy in his bathrobe, standing on his front porch scowling at the newspaper he came out to get that had the previous days' election results and the caption was: "I knew it!!! Not one of the candidates I would have voted for won!"

More Newser Stories

Jindal Cakewalks to 2nd Term in Louisiana

Jerry Brown's $37M Trumped Whitman's $179M

California Cutting Off 48K State Workers' Cell Phones

Whitman Gouging Press for Travel

Meg Whitman: Deport My Housekeeper


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne