Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Man Tries to Order Priciest Starbucks Drink Ever Total cost: $23.60 »

EPA Gets Nod to Crack Down on Industrial Greenhouse Gas

Big industrial plants to be targeted, not 'cows and Dunkin' Donuts'

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 1, 2009 5:51 AM CDT

(Newser) – The Obama administration has given the EPA the green light to start moving for the first time toward limiting greenhouse-gas emissions from major industrial sources. The proposed new rules would affect only large facilities that emit 25,000 tons or more of carbon dioxide annually, instead of applying to "every cow and Dunkin’ Donuts," as critics of EPA involvement in emissions control charge.

President Obama has said he would prefer comprehensive legislation to control emissions, although giving the EPA more power now is likely to push Congress into action, the New York Times notes. Supporters of the move say it will send the message to other countries that the US is taking serious action to tackle climate change. Opponents—especially the industries that will be most affected and plan legal action—say it's pointless to act against only some sources of emissions.

The Capitol looms behing coal-fired power plant in Washington.
The Capitol looms behing coal-fired power plant in Washington.   (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
A flock of geese fly past a smokestack at the Jeffery Energy Center coal power plant near Emmitt, Kan.
A flock of geese fly past a smokestack at the Jeffery Energy Center coal power plant near Emmitt, Kan.   (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

We are not going to continue with business as usual. We have the tools and the technology to move forward today, and we are using them.
- EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 10 comments
Aelius28
Oct 1, 2009 11:49 AM CDT
Err, how did politics get involved in this? You're a disturbed individual... What makes you think I support Obama? What if I said I didn't support Obama? Global Warming isn't a political issue, it's a scientific issue, politics has nothing to do with it. You clearly don't agree that global warming is happening or that it's due to man. Can you explain to us why you think that? Can you explain to us why you won't take 3 minutes out of your morning to perhaps change your view on one of the most important issues you may ever face in your life?
Timinator2K
Oct 1, 2009 11:44 AM CDT
Sorry, Alias82, liberals NEVER NEED PROOF...just a willingness to follow as a blindly loyal, unquestioning Obamazombie. 12/21/12, its ALL over any way, enjoy your time left on Earth, poop4brains.
Aelius28
Oct 1, 2009 11:42 AM CDT
Continental drift and solar flares are relatively harmless compared to climate change, and even if they weren't there's nothing we can do to prevent them. Climate change is largely preventable. If you don't accept the scientific fact of climate change, or the overwhelming consensus that it's the result of mankind, then go to Wikipedia's FAQ here that they set up for scientific illiterates like yourself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T... Any questions or objections you have will be fixed up no problem with this handy little guide for the layman. Oh, and don't come back and talk about climate change until you've read it. You'd just be proving your stubbornness.

More Newser Stories

EPA Declares CO2 a Pollutant

EPA Expected to Start Limiting CO2 Emissions

EPA's CO2 Ruling May Have Huge Impact

EPA Move to Curb Carbon Trumps Copenhagen

EPA Bucks Bush Policy, Lets Calif. Set Own CO2 Standard


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne