Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

White House Split on Afghanistan Strategy

'Skeptic-in-chief' Biden challenges McChrystal's call for more troops

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 2, 2009 1:17 AM CDT

(Newser) – Gen. Stanley McChrystal's call to beef up the war effort in Afghanistan is proving a tough sell with senior administration officials.  White House advisers challenged many aspects of the commander's assessment at a meeting this week, including his belief that al-Qaeda would again find sanctuary in Afghanistan if the Taliban regains control. Joe Biden played the role of "skeptic-in-chief," one official tells the Washington Post.

A gap is widening between administration officials who side with McChrystal, and those who want to narrow the war effort to focus solely on defeating al-Qaeda. Greater stability in Pakistan and the tainted election in Afghanistan in August have changed the situation since a policy review in March concluded that the two countries were a single problem, say advisers, who expect policy discussions to continue for some time.

General Stanley McChrystal, commander of the US forces in Afghanistan, delivers a speech in London yesterday.
General Stanley McChrystal, commander of the US forces in Afghanistan, delivers a speech in London yesterday.   (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)
Afghanistan National Army soldiers pose for a photograph on the outskirts of Kabul, Afghanistan.
Afghanistan National Army soldiers pose for a photograph on the outskirts of Kabul, Afghanistan.   (AP Photo/Manish Swarup)
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, commander of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force  in Afghanistan, left, salutes to ISAF soldiers during a changing of command ceremony in Kabul.
Gen. Stanley McChrystal, commander of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, left, salutes to ISAF soldiers during a changing of command ceremony in Kabul.   (AP Photo/Ahmad Massoud)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

A lot of decisions were made out of a sense of urgency in the previous administration, and they turned out to be wrong-headed. - A senior administration official

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 4 comments
SilenceDogood
Oct 2, 2009 12:16 PM CDT
A void of local government with peace keeping forces will create an incubator for terrorist, this is a fact. To do nothing will allow terrorist to flourish, to leave our Army in place will cause the loss of American lives. Where are the United Nations peaces keeping forces?
riffran
Oct 2, 2009 8:59 AM CDT
cut and run, run...rofl..or should I say WHOOOOPI THAT WAS A GOOD ONE stp
oldgoat
Oct 2, 2009 8:15 AM CDT
No instead of having the President find a general that will do what he wants this President appears to be wanting the general to actually justify his case. About time we have a President that does that. Also if you remember the past President didn't deliver on his getting OBL dead or alive and instead kept troop levels at a min where they could only control the main cities.

More Newser Stories

City-Focused Afghan Plan Winning Support

Obama Doubles Special Ops in Afghanistan

Obama Team Downplays Risks in Afghan Pullback

Weak Afghan al-Qaeda Calls Surge Into Question

Kristol: George Will Is Wrong on Afghanistan


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne