Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


31

Animal Cruelty Case Hits Supreme Court

Landmark case to decide 1st Amendment as it applies to cruelty

Share

(Newser) – Animal cruelty takes the floor of the Supreme Court tomorrow, as the justices consider whether to overturn an appeals court judgment that allows the depiction of animal cruelty under the auspices of the First Amendment. The lower court wasn’t keen on animal cruelty, but found that our furry friends—unlike children, say—“would likely not suffer continuing harm by having their images out in the marketplace."

The primary case was of a dog trainer who sold videos, purportedly for educational purposes, which included dogs attacking pigs and each other. Interestingly, Newsweek notes, he was prosecuted under a 1999 law that was intended to quash so-called “crush videos,” made for fetishists who get off on the high-heeled death of small animals. If the court overturns the ruling, depictions of animal cruelty would join the likes of child porn as expression not protected by the First Amendment.

A female cat covered in duct tape from head to toe which was dumped in a yard in Philadelphia.
A female cat covered in duct tape from head to toe which was dumped in a yard in Philadelphia.   (AP Photo)
A roper lifts a calf.
A roper lifts a calf.   (AP Photo)
Is this constitutionally protected?
Is this constitutionally protected?   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

While animals are worthy of human kindness and human care, one cannot seriously contend that the animals themselves suffer continuing harm by having their images out in the marketplace. - Third Circuit Court of Appeals

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
31 comments
VIEWING:
 
kyleleitch
Oct 5, 09 1:35 PM CDT
Good. I'm sorry but I don't think that the first amendment was ever intended to cover such brutality as 'dogs attacking pigs and each other.' Just like how it wasn't intended to cover small children being molested and recorded. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+16
IN RESPONSE:
Sauerkraut
Oct 5, 09 3:34 PM CDT
Perhaps your never seen a dog fighting a pig. I have, and the dog truly gets his ass kicked and chased down by the pigs. Pigs are smarter, and stronger then dogs. That hardly counts for animal cruelty. Now, sick fucks who like to see kittens getting stomped to death by high heels. Thats fucking sick, and those people should be shot.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
TREGANIL
Oct 5, 09 3:48 PM CDT
DO YOU HAVE A HEART? HOW ABOUT IF SOMEONE SEXUALLY MOLESTS YOUR CHILD AND SEE HOW UPSET YOU GET. SOME PEOPLE LOOK AT ANIMALS AS PART OF THEIR FAMILIES. I SURE WOULDN'T WANT A FAMILY MEMBER MOLESTED OR JUMPED WOULD YOU?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
kyleleitch
Oct 5, 09 6:33 PM CDT
@Sauerkraut, it doesn't matter which animal is winning; putting an dog and a pig in to fight each other is cruel. I can agree with you that people should be dealt with. Idk about shot, but definately dealt with harshly.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
Cprizzle
Oct 5, 09 1:36 PM CDT
There is no way to put a spin on animal cruelty. It's just plain gross, and shouldn't go unpunished. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+18
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.