Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Vietnam Books Playing Key Role in Afghan War Debate

Competing works on Vietnam War top policymakers' reading lists

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 7, 2009 8:24 AM CDT

(Newser) – A pair of books on the Vietnam War—one on why America should never have gotten involved, and one on how it could have won—are providing the framework for the Washington debate over Afghanistan strategy, insiders say. Lessons in Disaster, which describes how the White House was pushed into an "unwinnable" war by the military, is being read in the West Wing, while A Better War, which describes a military that has figured out how to counter an insurgency just as it is forced to end the fight by politicians, is on Pentagon reading lists.

A Better War, which argues that American intervention in Vietnam would have succeeded if the strategies employed after 1968 had been used from the outset, helped convert many skeptics on Capitol Hill in 2007 ahead of the surge in Iraq. Opponents of increasing troops in Afghanistan now say Lessons in Disaster neatly sums up their concerns. Both books, the Wall Street Journal notes, have been flying off the bookshelves in DC so fast it's now tough to find a copy of either one.

Lessons in Disaster describes how McGeorge Bundy, who pushed for escalating the war in Vietnam during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations, came to regret that decision.
"Lessons in Disaster" describes how McGeorge Bundy, who pushed for escalating the war in Vietnam during the Kennedy and Johnson administrations, came to regret that decision.   (Amazon)
A Better War by Lewis Sorley argues that the American military was on the road to success in Vietnam before being forced to withdraw by politicians swayed by public opinion.
"A Better War" by Lewis Sorley argues that the American military was on the road to success in Vietnam before being forced to withdraw by politicians swayed by public opinion.   (Amazon)
US helicopters of the International Security Assistance Force arrive in Badghis province, Afghanistan.
US helicopters of the International Security Assistance Force arrive in Badghis province, Afghanistan.   (AP Photo/Rahmat Gul)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 6 comments
SilenceDogood
Oct 8, 2009 8:25 AM CDT
Thinker, OK, following your argument to conclusion. How do we handle the Taliban and Al-Qaida terrorist issues in Afghanistan? How do we prevent Afghanistan from becoming the breeding ground and base camp for the Taliban and the Al-Qaida? No theory or moral imperatives, just a practical solution.
Thinker
Oct 7, 2009 5:06 AM CDT
When will people finally open their eyes and see that war is NOT about winning, but about profiteering? The poor fight and die and the rich laugh all the way to the bank.
Timinator2K
Oct 7, 2009 3:30 AM CDT
Bush stays out of genocidal Iraq, its a nuke arms race with Iran and the first to cross the finish line tosses the first home-grown nukes. Still, its not good as it is and Afghanistan...another political phuck-up war as there are no real/attainable goals (or, oil!) we can obtain with our short-attention span view of the world.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne