Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


49

US Pays $400 a Gallon for Gas in Afghanistan

Figure to become major talking point in Congress

Share

(Newser) – As debate over the Afghan war heats up, expect Congress to heavily quote a new statistic from the Pentagon: $400. That’s how much the US pays, on average, for every gallon of fuel put into its planes and combat vehicles in Afghanistan, military officials recently told the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee. “It is a number that we were not aware of, and it is worrisome,” John Murtha tells The Hill.

The subcommittee had asked the Pentagon to break down why it spends about $1 billion for every 1,000 troops deployed. The fuel bill is so high because Afghanistan is both inaccessible and underdeveloped. Fuel has to be shipped in through Pakistan, and then, since roads are scarce, it often must be flown to remote forward operating bases. “These are fairly major problems for us,” one General told a Navy energy forum this week.

An Afghan driver walks among the fuel tankers at the U.S. military base in Bagram north of Kabul, Afghanistan, Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2008.
An Afghan driver walks among the fuel tankers at the U.S. military base in Bagram north of Kabul, Afghanistan, Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2008.   (AP Photo/Musadeq Sadeq)
An F/A-18C Hornet takes on fuel from a British Royal Air Force L-1011 tanker aircraft.
An F/A-18C Hornet takes on fuel from a British Royal Air Force L-1011 tanker aircraft.   (AP P)hoto/US Navy - Erik Etz)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
49 comments
VIEWING:
 
tomodachi
Oct 16, 09 11:14 AM CDT
I'd guess $400 isn't what it costs... It's what (Halliburton?) charges us. I bet it could be bought and delivered to Afghanistan for considerably less if it was done through a contractor that wasn't sleeping with the government. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+26
IN RESPONSE:
prowlerzee
Oct 16, 09 5:34 PM CDT
Yeah, Obot, and WHO was it who strongarmed the Dems into approving all this money to be burned in continuing Bush-Cheney's war on terror? ZEROBAMA and his WH. How's that antiwar fraud working out for you now?
Vote up! Vote down!
-6
IN RESPONSE:
fancygapva
Oct 16, 09 11:21 PM CDT
Russia would be a good contractor. They have leases on lots of pipelines....
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Ana58
Oct 16, 09 11:31 AM CDT
Wow oh wow! We wont hear a word of outrage from the conservatives I'm sure as that would be attacking a Cheney Bush company. See ACORN is stealing from America but Halliburton is providing for our troops!...woo woo woo...We allow billion dollar thieves we can see with our own eyes to do as they please but then comes along a couple of young republican punks ( who broke the law!) to convince Congress, with ZERO proof that ACORN is fleecing the nation...ACORN....a group dedicated to helping the poor is fleecing the goverment....really....and what military contractors do by the billions is what again? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+26
IN RESPONSE:
Snarfeh
Oct 16, 09 11:40 AM CDT
^5 Ana!
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.