Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters


 MEDIA RARE 
10

Logical, Ethical Lapses Beset Washington Post

Op-ed page woes spread to editorial on Nobel Peace Prize

Share

(Newser) – The next-to-last straw was the Washington Post editorial saying Neda Agha Soltan should have won the Nobel Peace Prize, which isn't awarded posthumously. The last straw was today's op-ed raising—but not bothering to answer—the question of whether President Obama can even accept the honor without violating the Constitution. The piece confirms that "the Post op-ed page has gone completely off the rails," and Alex Pareene of Gawker isn't holding back.

George Will's fact-checking difficulties, Anne Applebaum's lack of full disclosure, and William Kristol's being "not just wrong but boring and lazy" have Pareene riled up, and he's not the only one. James Fallows of the Atlantic, nobody's idea of a snarky blogger, flagged the factual failing of the Neda argument, writing, "It took 0.24 seconds to find that info, and it would have taken maybe another fifteen seconds to change the sentence in the editorial."

This October 2008 photo shows the Washington Post building on 15th St. NW in Washington, DC.
This October 2008 photo shows the Washington Post building on 15th St. NW in Washington, DC.   (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)
The facade of the Washington Post building in Northwest Washington.
The facade of the Washington Post building in Northwest Washington.   (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert,file)
Norwegian Nobel Committee chair Thorbjorn Jagland holds a photo of this year's winner of the Peace Prize, which is not awarded posthumously--right, Washington Post editorial board?
Norwegian Nobel Committee chair Thorbjorn Jagland holds a photo of this year's winner of the Peace Prize, which is not awarded posthumously--right, Washington Post editorial board?   (AP Photo/Torbjorn Gronning)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
10 comments
VIEWING:
 
odowd80
Oct 16, 09 4:21 PM CDT
News flash...conservative columnists are not only stupid, but too lazy to do basic fact-checking! I don't think anyone will find this story surprising. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
godawgs
Oct 16, 09 4:31 PM CDT
New Flash...liberal columnists don't really check their stuff either. http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/15/huffpo-rick-sanchez-retract-phony-limbaugh-quotes/
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
bewilderbeast
Oct 19, 09 9:25 AM CDT
The thing is they KNOW WHAT THEY HAVE TO WRITE. There's a pattern. A script. The good guys wear white hats and the bad guys - beards, maybe? So there's not much thinking that needs to be done. If Ahmedinijad gives a speech you don't have to listen to it or read it. You simply blast it with a few standard phrases. It's a complete waste of time to read or do research: It's not going to change anything anyway.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
TheSniperZero
Oct 16, 09 4:28 PM CDT
"Logical, ethical lapses" haven't stopped the New York TImes, Huffington Post, MSNBC or any of the other lefty media outlets- (or Pelosi, Reid or Rangel for that matter) So what's the point here? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
n00tch
Oct 16, 09 5:33 PM CDT
The point is that you should all be outraged at the fact that these people are feeding you a line of crap. But no, please, keep on cheerleading for your side. I mean, does red crap really taste better than blue crap?
Vote up! Vote down!
+9
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 

from our news partners

Please wait, content is loading
Please wait, content is loading

Just For Laughs

Loading...