Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


2

Supreme Court Takes Uighurs' Case

Share

(AP) – The Supreme Court will hear a new case about the rights of Guantanamo detainees, this time involving prisoners who remain in custody even after the Pentagon determines they're not a threat to the United States, the court said today. Last year, the court said in a 5-4 ruling that federal judges could ultimately order some detainees to be released, depending on security concerns and other circumstances.

But a federal appeals court overturned a judge's order to do just that in the case of the Chinese Muslims, or Uighurs, saying judges lacked authority to order detainees released into the United States. The Obama administration urged the court to stay out of the case, noting that diplomatic efforts to find countries to accept the Uighurs are ongoing. Even since the administration's court filing, four Uighurs have been sent to Bermuda, while six have accepted an invitation to move to Palau. The Pacific nation has offered to take six of the seven other Uighurs at Guantanamo.

Chinese Uighur Guantanamo detainees, who at the time were cleared for release but had no country to go to, show a home-made note to visiting members of the media, at Camp Iguana detention facility.
Chinese Uighur Guantanamo detainees, who at the time were cleared for release but had no country to go to, show a home-made note to visiting members of the media, at Camp Iguana detention facility.   (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, Pool, File)
Chief Justice John Roberts sits for a new group photograph with other Supreme Court judges, Tuesday, Sept. 29, 2009, at the Supreme Court.
Chief Justice John Roberts sits for a new group photograph with other Supreme Court judges, Tuesday, Sept. 29, 2009, at the Supreme Court.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
2 comments
VIEWING:
 
d3wd
Oct 20, 09 1:52 PM CDT
Due process anyone? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
cornelison
Oct 20, 09 2:10 PM CDT
If there's no evidence of a crime the detainees should have been released several years ago. Having said that, It's better to send them to other countries than accept them on American soil. It's the political reality. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 

Copyright 2009 Newser, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. AP contributed to this report.