Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


6

Newsday Jumps Behind a Paywall

Opts for 'hyper-local' approach

Share

(Newser) – If you’ve been reading a ton of Newsday stories online, we’ve got some bad news: the Long Island daily plans to erect a paywall next week. The paper’s online content will now be closed to everyone except print subscribers, Optimum Online customers, and anyone willing to pay $5 a week for it, notes Editor & Publisher. The paper called it a “pioneering web model” and said it would be taking a “hyper-local approach” focusing on Long Island.

A Monday edition of Newsday is shown May 12, 2008 in New York.
A Monday edition of Newsday is shown May 12, 2008 in New York.   (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
The mastheads of the New York Post and Newsday are seen in this photo in New York,  Friday, March 21, 2008.
The mastheads of the New York Post and Newsday are seen in this photo in New York, Friday, March 21, 2008.   (AP Photo/Richard Drew)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
6 comments
VIEWING:
 
Yourself
Oct 22, 09 1:10 PM CDT
well, that's the end of Newsday's online sector. I don't know of anyone willing to pay for online news when they know they can get it elsewhere for free. Especially in this economy. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
Spudsy
Oct 22, 09 4:26 PM CDT
$260 a year would be a little steep for me even before the recession.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Thinker
Oct 22, 09 1:49 PM CDT
Rather than get all conservative on us and try to force us back to the old-fashioned ways, newspapers should wake the hell up. Look, we are NOT going to pay for mediocre news, printed or online, when there are great journalists out there willing to give it to us for free. Frankly, I'd rather give a $10 per month donation for a not-for-profit (aka, non-biased) news source than pay $5 a year to a corporate big-wig or corrupt CEO (think Rupert Murdoch) who will only give me their political agendas wrapped up in a pretty news mask. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
davjc09
Oct 22, 09 2:05 PM CDT
I agree with you almost completely, Thinker. I would, however, like to point out that political agendas are evident even in the "non-biased" newspapers. A conservative editor can still report a liberal story, but bury it on page 27 when it should be front page or maybe second page. And vice versa. Bringing issues he or she thinks is important to the reader.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
ThinkerIsDumb
Oct 22, 09 2:48 PM CDT
To these few who posted comments: keep reading your "free" news on the web. My bet is that you will see more and more paywalls erected in 2010. Why? Because "free" doesn't pay the bills. "Free" doesn't pay the journalists, or the legal teams needed to protect newspapers from suits. "Free" doesn't cover the costs ... period. The economy is in turmoil, and one of the first places that businesses cut expenses is: advertising ... and that is what provided the luxury of "free" news on the web. You didn't actually believe that Google and Yahoo employs their own reporters, did you? Give it a year as hundreds of newspapers with paywalls turn into thousands of newspapers with paywalls. Then, find your free news or ... wait until the 5 p.m. news on television. Or ... even better ... put up your own websites and post your own free news stories. Post the links here and lets see if you're still reporting all the great free news a year or two from now. Have fun. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.