Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


9

Feds Pitch Polar Bear Habitat

Critics complain move doesn't address main threats

Share

(Newser) – The federal government has proposed designating 200,000 square miles of land, sea, and ice in northern Alaska as a critical habitat for polar bears. The move is "one step in the right direction to help this species stave off extinction," said an Interior Department official. He acknowledged, however, that the melting of sea ice caused by climate change is the biggest threat to the bears. 

Conservationists welcomed the move, but complained that new offshore oil and gas developments have already been approved in the habitat, despite the law saying federal agencies cannot "adversely modify" critical habitat. "Hard to see how putting an oil rig in the heart of polar bear habitat does not adversely modify it," a lawyer for an environmental group told the Los Angeles Times.

The Obama administration porposes setting aside 200,000 square miles as
The Obama administration porposes setting aside 200,000 square miles as "critical habitat" for polar bears, an action that could add restrictions to future offshore drilling for oil and gas.   (AP Photo/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FILE)
A polar bear takes a dip off the coast of Alaska during an aerial search.
A polar bear takes a dip off the coast of Alaska during an aerial search.   (AP Photo)
Some 3500 polar bears live in the designated critical habitat.
Some 3500 polar bears live in the designated critical habitat.   (AP Photo/Subhankar Banerjee, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

If polar bears are to survive in a rapidly melting Arctic, we need to protect their critical habitat, not turn it into a polluted industrial zone. - Brendan Cummings, a lawyer with the Center for Biological Diversity

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
9 comments
VIEWING:
 
JoeQ
Oct 23, 09 1:57 AM CDT
You can always make a polar bear. Just start with a rectangular bear and transform the coordinate system. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+5
IN RESPONSE:
riffran
Oct 23, 09 2:35 AM CDT
OK...I don't care who ya are THATS funny....clever word smithing there joey Q
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
bewilderbeast
Oct 23, 09 5:20 AM CDT
Careful. Might end up with a bipolar bear - and them can be nasty.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Jayster999
Oct 23, 09 2:05 AM CDT
Bet you dollars to doughnuts they pick a place for the bears that covers a major oil field. God forbid we should have any kind of self-reliance. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
ultramarine13
Oct 23, 09 2:49 AM CDT
Jay, said oil is why the bears are in trouble in the first place True reliance would be to switch to sustainable alternative; solar, wind and water for electricity, and some sort of biofuel (cellulose ethanol comes to mind) for the things that can't easily use electricity. Planes for instance. That's true self-reliance, not drilling all over the world for something that will run out before long anyway.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.