Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 PAYBACK 
20

Michael Moore Attracts His Own Gadflies

Veritable 'cottage industry' of negative docs on documentarian

Share

(Newser) – Michael Moore makes a living speaking truth to power, and an assortment of other filmmakers are lining up to speak truth to him. “There's actually more films made attacking me than films I've made,” he tells the Wall Street Journal. They include Fahrenhype 9/11, Celsius 41.11, Michael & Me, and Me & Michael. The standout is Shooting Michael Moore, and not just because of the title. The filmmaker actually knows Moore.

Kevin Leffler is a registered Democrat, Michigan native, and high school classmate of Moore’s. “I am doing exactly what Mike would do, except I am doing it to him,” he says. Leffler discovered that a Moore foundation once owned stock in the likes of Halliburton, and has interviewed subjects in past Moore docs he says were manipulated. Shooting Michael Moore, conceived in 2004, had a brief run last year, but not before it helped ruined Leffler’s marriage. “It wasn't the only factor, but it played a role.”

Filmmaker Michael Moore.
Filmmaker Michael Moore.   (AP Photo)
Film director Michael Moore.
Film director Michael Moore.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
"Shooting Michael Moore" director Kevin Leffler.   (hypocritecomllc)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next »

It's just that as we watched Mike evolve, many people around here, including me, weren't buying his act. - Kevin Leffler, on his motivation

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
20 comments
VIEWING:
 
IllinoisBoy_IN_LA
Oct 23, 09 12:49 PM CDT
Legit documentaries show BOTH SIDES of a story. The films Moore makes are propaganda movies and opportunistic. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+5
IN RESPONSE:
emptycalm
Oct 23, 09 1:06 PM CDT
Not necessarily . I'd say a good documentary can show one side but show it objectively. I'm not saying moore is very objective but your analysis is wrong. And at the very least, his documentaries are thought provoking. Don't be ignorant of questions just because of the source. Even those FOX news reactionaries accidentally ask an intelligent question here and there. Maybe instead of giving a shit about Moore, this guy should try to make a documentary about how capitalism is just fine and we're all gonna go back to the 1950's to refute Moore's recent film.
Vote up! Vote down!
+8
IN RESPONSE:
Fondue
Oct 23, 09 1:12 PM CDT
I wonder if legit news channels should do the same.
Vote up! Vote down!
+9
IN RESPONSE:
johntitor
Oct 23, 09 1:36 PM CDT
Damn good post emptycalm...
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
IN RESPONSE:
DarkFrancis
Oct 23, 09 8:23 PM CDT
I'd go further than 'not necessarily' and say 'bullshit'. Docs are no longer necessarily about balance, they are about analysis and opinion and correcting the ledger. We USED to be able to hang our hats on news for balance, so documentaries were deeper examinations and investigations of things. But the days of balanced news are dead. As news changed, so did the doc. It has become, in large part, the anti-news, showing you what the news media don't.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.