Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 CHEMICAL REVISITED 
8

Dopamine: Produces the Rush, Not the Pleasure

The "it" neurotransmitter stimulates drive, not good feeling

Share

(Newser) – Dopamine has become the decade’s “it” neurotransmitter, just as serotonin was in the ‘90s. But the popular image of dopamine as the brain chemical in charge of making us feel good, and hooking us on craving that feeling, a “Bacchus in the brain,” is misleading and incomplete, writes Natalie Angier of the New York Times. New research has led to the emerging consensus that dopamine is less about pleasure than about motivation.

“When you can’t breathe, and you’re gasping for air, would you call that pleasurable? Or when you’re so hungry that you eat something disgusting?” says one researcher. Yet in those instances dopamine pathways are at defcon 1. They’ll fire over something we desire, yes, but also over something we fear. And they serve another, lesser known function: They're novelty detectors. Whenever something around you is unusual or otherwise demands attention, dopamine makes sure you spot it. “You might not notice a fly in the room, but if that fly was fluorescent, your dopamine cells would fire,” she adds.

A dopamine molecule
A dopamine molecule   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
8 comments
VIEWING:
 
Derni
Oct 27, 09 10:55 AM CDT
Yes-it does help the body opay attention to new things and then respond with curiosty-fight-flight-or pleasure...a great neurotransmitter...biological evolution has given us these excititory and inhibitory neurotransmitters to regulate the body..amazing aren't they! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
wakeUp
Oct 27, 09 11:02 AM CDT
Biological evolution? What did Dopamine evolve from and what proof do you have of this? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-6
IN RESPONSE:
Thinker
Oct 27, 09 11:15 AM CDT
wakeUp, please wakeup. Everything about us has evolved (whether you want to believe it or not).
Vote up! Vote down!
+5
IN RESPONSE:
carpenocturne
Oct 27, 09 11:32 AM CDT
No shame in asking this question, I am equally curious. Curiosity isn't blind skepticism...
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Unaffiliated
Oct 27, 09 12:00 PM CDT
While you're certainly free to ask whatever question you like, you're not going to disprove evolutionary theory by asking this particular question. You set up a straw man and then easily knock it down. This is no exceptional feat of logical abilities. This is a cop out to really critically understanding evolutionary theory and posing more useful questions. Just because scientists may not have proof for evolution in 100% of biological history, an impossible standard to hold any testable hypothesis to, does not mean that evolutionary theory is incorrect.
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.