Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Let's Hope Baucus Doesn't 'Gum Up' Climate Bill

He's already trying to water down

By Harry Kimball,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 29, 2009 12:25 PM CDT

(Newser) – Now that his committee is done with health care reform, Max Baucus has time to turn his attention to the climate bill. As a member of Barbara Boxer's environmental panel, "his ability to gum up the works is significant," writes Kate Sheppard. Essentially, he may do to the climate bill what he did to the health care bill—hold it up, then water it down in the name of bipartisanship.

“I support passing common-sense climate legislation,” he says. But “the key word in that sentence is ‘passing.’” Among other things, Baucus thinks the target of cutting emissions 20% by 2020 is too ambitious, though it's actually "easily attainable," writes Sheppard in Mother Jones. The good news: Democrats should have enough votes to move it out of committee with or without Baucus. And Boxer isn't having any of this bipartisan argument: "Global warming isn't waiting for who's a Democrat or who's a Republican.”

Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Chairman Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., left, confer.
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Chairman Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., left, confer.   (AP Photo)
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., looks on before speaking to reporters about health care reform legislation, Thursday, Oct. 15, 2009.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., looks on before speaking to reporters about health care reform legislation, Thursday, Oct. 15, 2009.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Max Baucus.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 16 comments
tomodachi
Oct 30, 2009 12:08 PM CDT
@ultramarine13: You attributed the (supposedly) low cost of gas in the US to the many Billions tax payers pay in subsidies to the oil companies. Do you really think the oil companies are so honorable as to reduce cost at the pump charged to consumers because of the free money their given from the government? And if the US government is paying Billions in subsidies, then aren't WE taxpayers, paying the full price similar to other countries via direct pump prices and indirect subsidies? Wouldn't it be better if we stopped paying Billions in subsidies and let gasoline be priced from a free market??? And lastly... how does your theory of lower prices via subsidies factor in with the many countries in the world that pay less than the US for gas? Some of which are significantly less... like Venezuela @ 12 cents per gallon. Do you think their government collects $8 per gallon from then in subsidies... so they can pay nearly nothing at the pump? This seems highly unlikely.
FreeThemAll
Oct 29, 2009 9:21 AM CDT
Well put.
FreeThemAll
Oct 29, 2009 9:16 AM CDT
Right on the mark, doc. Jayster came through for you.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne