Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Dems Torn: Too Much Change, or Not Enough?

Do voters want them to ditch presidential agenda, or complete it?

By Harry Kimball,  Newser Staff

Posted Nov 5, 2009 9:15 AM CST

(Newser) – Democrats in Congress reading the tea leaves of Tuesday’s elections find themselves split: were the Republican wins in Virginia and New Jersey a vote of no confidence in the administration’s agenda, or frustration that it isn’t moving fast enough? Most agree on the first step going forward: pass health care reform. After that, it gets fractious.

One representative wants health care reform so he can “give Democrats something to be excited about” come the 2010 elections, he tells the Washington Post. Get “health care done” and then turn their “attention to the economy and jobs,” a strategist recommends. A liberal rep wants to push through the entire administration agenda—after all, “victory breeds victory.” But Sen. Jay Rockefeller isn't buying: “Don't think people in my state are going to stand up and start cheering about Copenhagen.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The question is, do people think we're tending to the things they care about? - Sen. Jay Rockefeller

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 40 comments
Face-Of-RNC
Nov 9, 2009 6:59 AM CST
pedar keeper is performing his obligatory Beck sheep hate bleating.
Face-Of-RNC
Nov 9, 2009 6:57 AM CST
don't - your intellectual thrusts and parries have wounded me to the core.
tomodachi
Nov 6, 2009 12:44 PM CST
I hate the idea of spending more tax revenue... even on jobs stimulus, but the US economy is 70% consumer spending. If the US government doesn't spend to recreate the lost jobs, then few will... and the economy will falter. And yes... if the money is going to be spent... then it MUST be done so in ways that produce the most bang for the buck. If I had my way, we wouldn't of given a dime to privately held Chrysler. That money should have instead been spent investing in US companies that make electric cars like Tesla Motors or Fisker Automotive. This would have supported new technology jobs and promoted people and corporations that build in the US. And it helps reduce air pollution... And it would have helped the US become less dependent on oil from the middle east... where people march in the streets and shout "Death to America." I'm looking forward to the day when we can tell OPEC to shove their oil. The US needs stimulus... smart stimulus.

More Newser Stories

Nancy Pelosi, John Boehner Win House Posts

How Dems Could Keep the House

9 House Races to Watch

Durbin, Schumer Jockeying for Reid's Majority Post

Poll: Obama Voters Deserting Democrats


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne