Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 ELECTION FALLOUT 
42

Dems Torn: Too Much Change, or Not Enough?

Do voters want them to ditch presidential agenda, or complete it?

Share

(Newser) – Democrats in Congress reading the tea leaves of Tuesday’s elections find themselves split: were the Republican wins in Virginia and New Jersey a vote of no confidence in the administration’s agenda, or frustration that it isn’t moving fast enough? Most agree on the first step going forward: pass health care reform. After that, it gets fractious.

One representative wants health care reform so he can “give Democrats something to be excited about” come the 2010 elections, he tells the Washington Post. Get “health care done” and then turn their “attention to the economy and jobs,” a strategist recommends. A liberal rep wants to push through the entire administration agenda—after all, “victory breeds victory.” But Sen. Jay Rockefeller isn't buying: “Don't think people in my state are going to stand up and start cheering about Copenhagen.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The question is, do people think we're tending to the things they care about? - Sen. Jay Rockefeller

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
42 comments
VIEWING:
 
tomodachi
Nov 5, 09 9:19 AM CST
Spend less money bailing out the incompetents... spend more money on stimulating US jobs. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+14
IN RESPONSE:
dontlikeyou
Nov 5, 09 5:09 PM CST
Democrats aren't split... they are unwilling to face the truth--- America voted for change, but it did not expect that change to come in the shape of socialism. It's a natural reaction which will continue until the socialists in power are removed from power.
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
IN RESPONSE:
tomodachi
Nov 5, 09 7:39 PM CST
You appear to have no idea what socialism is. Following your logic, GWB was the biggest socialist ever... he took huge amounts of money from the people that worked for it... and gave it to oil-people and war-machine-making people who didn't deserve it.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
carpenocturne
Nov 6, 09 4:42 AM CST
lol tomodachi, jokes on you. redistribution is only a facet of socialism, though the arrows point toward the people. i don't think we need to be spending more money to stimulate jobs. we need to do just the opposite. conserve and buy/sell smart until we can stabilize the market.
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
tomodachi
Nov 6, 09 6:44 AM CST
I hate the idea of spending more tax revenue... even on jobs stimulus, but the US economy is 70% consumer spending. If the US government doesn't spend to recreate the lost jobs, then few will... and the economy will falter. And yes... if the money is going to be spent... then it MUST be done so in ways that produce the most bang for the buck. If I had my way, we wouldn't of given a dime to privately held Chrysler. That money should have instead been spent investing in US companies that make electric cars like Tesla Motors or Fisker Automotive. This would have supported new technology jobs and promoted people and corporations that build in the US. And it helps reduce air pollution... And it would have helped the US become less dependent on oil from the middle east... where people march in the streets and shout "Death to America." I'm looking forward to the day when we can tell OPEC to shove their oil. The US needs stimulus... smart stimulus.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.