Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
14

'Tear Down This Wall' Not So Confrontational

Reagan 'defeated' Soviets with diplomacy, not bravado

Share

(Newser) – Prepare to see a lot of clips in the coming days of Ronald Reagan declaring, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!” The 20th anniversary of the Berlin wall’s fall is days away, and in our collective memory, Reagan brought it down with sheer bravado. But that’s misremembering, writes James Mann, author of a book on the president and the Cold War. Reagan’s actual policies were conciliatory, diplomatic ones that conservatives hated.

Reagan met an unprecedented five times with Mikhail Gorbachev and negotiated an arms-control treaty with him. One conservative leader called him a “useful idiot for Soviet propaganda.” The most important part of Reagan’s Brandenburg declaration was the address to “Mr. Gorbachev.” The East Germans officially controlled the wall, and Reagan was telling him, essentially, to stop supporting them. When East Germans rushed the wall 5 months later, Gorbachev did nothing, and “Reagan’s diplomacy had quite a bit to do with that.”

Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev (right) synchronize their watches.
Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev (right) synchronize their watches.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
An excerpt from Ronald Reagan's famous "Tear down this wall" speech.   (GiulioBenderGrieco)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next »

Reagan's actual policies, bitterly contested at the time, were aimed at courting Gorbachev, building up his stature and doing business with him. - James Mann

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
14 comments
VIEWING:
 
Doctor_Zaius
Nov 6, 09 12:56 PM CST
What brought the Soviets down was a little war in in a backwater province in Asia known as...Afghanistan. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+8
IN RESPONSE:
Scrambles
Nov 6, 09 1:21 PM CST
yep, on top of being a "communist" government which really masked a dictatorship with more money invested in their army than in the infrastructure of a country with ridiculous amounts of povery
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Doctor_Zaius
Nov 6, 09 1:45 PM CST
Sound like anyone you know?
Vote up! Vote down!
+8
IN RESPONSE:
johntitor
Nov 6, 09 2:54 PM CST
Yea im with you, we have Charlie Wilson to thank...I've always thought it was our consumerism as well, we often overlook that mindset as a weapon, what were Levi's going for on the other side of the wall? Once Mcdonalds went in it was over...
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
EpicFailGuy
Nov 7, 09 5:34 AM CST
Really scrambles? And the States weren't building up their army? You know, there was a thing called a "Cold War", where BOTH sides were spending large amounts of their resources on military spending and not giving half a shit about their respective people in poverty.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.