Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Suddenly, Ron Paul Feels the Love

Libertarian's anti-Fed campaign draws mainstream support

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Nov 30, 2009 12:00 PM CST

(Newser) – Ron Paul is suddenly the belle of the ball on Capitol Hill, with legislators from around the political spectrum backing his decades-old crusade against the Federal Reserve. Paul’s been pushing an amendment to audit the Fed since the early '80s, but this time it attracted a whopping 313 co-sponsors. Democrats who might normally have voted for a compromise backed by Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank sided with Paul instead.

“On financial regulation matters, most Americans sympathize with Ron Paul’s outrage,” one analyst tells Politico. Paul’s fierce opposition to America’s interventionist foreign policy is also earning him fans. Two Democrats joined him on Nov. 18 to make floor speeches against spending more in Afghanistan and Pakistan. “Eventually we’ll win,” says Paul. “Not because they’re going to listen to us and have another foreign policy but… because we don’t have any money, we’re broke, and the troops will come home.”

House Financial Services Committee member Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, asks questions of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke during the committee's hearing on Capitol Hill, Feb. 10, 2009.
House Financial Services Committee member Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, asks questions of Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke during the committee's hearing on Capitol Hill, Feb. 10, 2009.   (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
8%
8%
0%
0%
83%
0%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 71 comments
ende
Dec 1, 2009 8:53 AM CST
From what I recall, while Dr Paul has a moral objection to abortion, I believe his libertarian principals override his moral objections via his objection to government regulation of our personal lives. Something that libertarian-haters among the left tend to fail to realize is that pro-choice is very common within the 'libertarian' platform. The LP's official stance is pro-choice. In fact one of their slogans is that they are 'pro choice on every issue'.
ende
Dec 1, 2009 7:55 AM CST
@dax They were mostly looking on in horror as the Contract With America era forces faded into populist driven social and economic regulation once only thought capable of by Democrats. I can't speak for them, really, I don't count myself among the 'right' or the 'left'. But I think it's useful and necessary to differentiate between the intellectually (whether you agree with the actual views or not) grounded libertarianism of Goldwater / Paul and the more populist non-libertarian conservative movement exemplified by the likes of Palin or Bush. If the later group shares anything with the former, it's only because it's in opposition to the current democrat powers that be. In other words, the Goldwater/Paul types (ranging from libertarian-conservatives to non-aligned libertarians) derive their stances from a particular school of thought, while the Palin/Hannity/Rush lead crowd know only that they need 1) some 'core values' (once they're done figuring out what those are) and 2) to beat 'dem democrats. To further answer your question, the 2nd group was too stupid to realize what was going on, they were just content that their party was in power, while the 1st group were looking on in disgust. (What's interesting is that such a divide exists within Democrats as well)
ende
Dec 1, 2009 7:41 AM CST
@prowlerzee What are you possibly adding to this discussion? All you're doing is calling names and attempting to stoke emotional responses. You sound as though you have an emotional investment in this discussion more than an intellectual one. Ok, you believe that anyone who doesn't agree with your ideals of market regulation is some sort of simple minded Ayn Rand worshiper. You've stated your view once, I don't really think you need to reply to every comment with this same basic response. BrianDefferding, gneiberg, et al all have presented well thought out arguments on either side. You would do well to sit, read them, consider them, and only if you have something constructive to add, do so. But please, spare us the condescending remarks. They bear no substance worth reading.

More Newser Stories

Frank Rewriting Wall Street Rules as Public Yawns

Ron Paul Poised to Finally Pass Fed Audits

Pols Pitch Federal Agency to Take On Bad Debt

Ron Paul Has Already Changed the Game

Johnson Exits GOP Race to Run as Libertarian


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne