Oil Giants Bend to Iraq's Terms

War for oil hasn't been too lucrative for American companies
By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff
Posted Dec 1, 2009 10:35 AM CST
An Iraqi worker operates valves at the Rumaila oil refinery, near the city of Basra, 550 kilometers (340 miles) southeast of Baghdad, Iraq, on Monday, Nov. 9, 2009.   (AP Photo/Nabil al-Jourani)
camera-icon View 1 more image

(Newser) – If the Iraq war was fought for oil, it’s done little to enrich American oil companies, which are just now striking deals to service the country’s fields—and at far worse terms than they’d hoped. Most companies balked at Iraq’s initial service contract offers, refusing to bid in a June auction. But in the past month, many have swallowed their pride and inked nearly identical deals, the New York Times reports.

The oil giants were after production-sharing agreements, but to Iraqis those deals smacked of colonial times, when foreign companies controlled the country’s fields. They favored service contracts, which pay the companies a fee per barrel produced. The profit margins are tiny, but the companies have accepted, believing they need to get a foothold in Iraq. They’re hoping for better contracts later on, and a crack at the loaded Basra fields.

My Take on This Story
Show results without voting  |